Will be interesting to see what happens due to the NCAA announcement this morning that in the near future SCHOOLS WILL BE ABLE TO DIRECTLY PAY NIL TO ATHLETES. A series of POTENTIAL changes were mentioned in a letter from the NCAA including "potentially different rules for programs with bigger brands and athletic budgets in a separate subdivision .... establishing their own rules on NIL limits, portal transfers...etc.
A potential cutoff level was mentioned as $100 million dollar athletic budgets and up. Does the prospect of the NCAA permitting / pushing for "a new subdivision" then automatically void the GOR on any ACC program that would have the athletic budget and interest in "joining" the new subdivision? Would this new "subdivision" also give the SEC and ACC the ability to weed out "lesser" brands (ie, Vanderbilt, Rutgers)?.
A potential cutoff level was mentioned as $100 million dollar athletic budgets and up. Does the prospect of the NCAA permitting / pushing for "a new subdivision" then automatically void the GOR on any ACC program that would have the athletic budget and interest in "joining" the new subdivision? Would this new "subdivision" also give the SEC and ACC the ability to weed out "lesser" brands (ie, Vanderbilt, Rutgers)?.