Can't see UNC taking a long-term reduced share based upon their own opinion of their "brand" and with Bubba Cunningham's most recent public posture regarding FSU. They'd realllllly look pathetic bolting with FSU (albeit to a different conference).on the cheap.
I mean if we take a step back without orange and green glasses… Virginia is also a growing state as people move out of DC. But that aside, UVA and UNC are both large state schools with top notch academics and huge alumni bases, and that looks a **** of a lot more similar to the rest of the conference. I’m not saying we don’t get a spot but it’s crazy for people to not understand why these schools are being discussed and that this is a very conceivable outcome.
Maybe because we are thinking this is all about football and that they want to compete with the SEC for conference supremacy?
They already made that play with Maryland and Rutgers, and I don’t think the networks will pay more to pursue that strategy again.
You are familiar with the Titanic Brewery across from the U of Miami baseball field right?
were not getting into the SEC.
I just have to ask.
no my opinion is the SEC wont take us and dont want us. I think its b10 or die
Well I don't think you have been reading a lot of comments in this thread then.
That is the more traditional "conference view" of new candidates ... but the reality is their first two choices (FSU / Clemson) are 100% VIEWER / tv math driven additions. The next best "viewer market addition" is Miami.
Got to believe that Frenk would take Radakovich's recommendation on this.
Must have missed that ... as far as everything I have ever read or heard Miami was NEVER a take for the SEC and has been Big10 bound 100% as far as "realignment" is concerned.
