- Joined
- Dec 22, 2011
- Messages
- 47,479
Time to horse-trade.
Expansion votes in exchange for a repeal of the GOR and/or GOR extension.
Whoever you said was a part of the mope squad.What was his name?
Agree 100%. If FSU and Clemson go to B1G then we are screwed big time. Don’t see B1G adding more and we are left out then. As others have said we need to just become a basketball school.Yup I think it’s pretty clear FSU/Clemson going to the SEC would actually make it more likely we land in the B1G. If FSU/Clemson went to the B1G, I’d be nervous they could stop at 20.
Was that the so called “alliance”?They don't have a choice at this point. They messed it up signing the GOR. Also back when SEC signed OK and Texas the ACC tried to get something done with PAC at that time but the PAC was arrogant. That backfired on them.
Clemson guy
Clemson guy
Maybe because we are thinking this is all about football and that they want to compete with the SEC for conference supremacy?
But you may have a point. Maybe thats not what they want to do at all lol
Because Maryland, Rutgers, Indiana, Northwestern, Minnesota and then add Virginia? Yeah good luck on that return.
I agree 100%, but I am just saying people who act incredulous that there is no world where the B10 would take UNC and/or UVA over Miami are short sighted. We simply do not know, especially factoring in the half share vs full.Everything you say is true.
If this was a "100% academics" decision, UNC and UVa make sense.
If this is a "100% TV" decision, Miami gets in over both of those schools, particularly if F$U goes SEC.
The question is whether the decision will be closer to "academics" or "TV". Thus far, everything the Big 10 has done has indicated that this is a TV decision, particularly prioritizing two NON-AAU schools (F$U-Clemson).
Is this verified? Do you know which schools?4 schools against
So do all the magnificient 7 really have the same agenda?4 schools against
Just saw a couple on X they didn’t say who so farIs this verified? Do you know which schools?