Billy D Williams
Senior
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2013
- Messages
- 8,756
The only ACC team the SEC would accept is Clemson. Gates, baga, gawja, aubun and tenn would never vote for us.
Sadly FSUWho do you think the SEC takes if it came down to UM or FSU?
Who called USC and UCLA to the Big10? I’d like to know his other predictions…thanks in advance.Look, anybody who didn’t see this coming even before today is completely blind. But after USC and UCLA are looking to bolt, it’s definite. The ACC is dead. There are no more marquee programs in big markets to poach. So it’s time to get out of this godforsaken conference and be proactive.
I’ve been told that some conversations have already taken place, and frankly with who our AD is now, I’d have been shocked had that not happened. But it’s time to join the SEC. The writing is on the wall in size 1000 font that within the next several years, there will be 2 “superconferences” of at least 18 teams each. Probably more. They will be the SEC and B1G.
Now, we have an advantage here. I don’t think there’s any scenario where we’re left out in the cold, because obviously Miami is a desirable market for any conference. So we *should* be fine. But it’s time to be proactive. There is no reason to be aligned with Tobacco Road any longer. The revenues provided to member institutions of the SEC and B1G will probably be MORE THAN DOUBLE those of the ACC very soon. So, the sooner the better here. I hope we’re not hanging only any sense of loyalty to the ACC. It’s time to do what’s best for this university and that is to move IMMEDIATELY to the SEC.
Let’s hope the leadership understands the criticality of this. We cannot afford to be left behind. My guess is we’ll be in the SEC no later than 2025. If not, it’s a massive failure.
If we’re moving because of a TV deal from a financial standpoint the B1G would be the most feasible because we could make could money from conference TV payout & still be a relevant team in Top heavy conference that really only has 1 possibly 2 dominant teams (in Football).I rather go to B10:
-OSU
-UofM
-Miami
-SC
-MSU
-PSU
-Iowa
-Wisky
Makes for a **** football conference
-Miami
-Northwestern
-SC
-Michigan
-UCLA
-Wisconsin
-Illinois
-OSU
-Purdue
-Maryland
-PSU
-Rutgers
-Indiana
(All w/in the top 70 in the Nation)
Makes for a **** academic conference
The B1G is already a strong b-ball conference, so adding a newly cemented Elite 8 team in Miami + the legend of UCLA will bolster the B1G’s rep.
Thoughts? @Liberty City El
If we’re moving because of a TV deal from a financial standpoint the B1G would be the most feasible because we could make could money from conference TV payout & still be a relevant team in Top heavy conference that really only has 1 possibly 2 dominant teams (in Football).
If it’s a regional move & more centered around potential future opponents & recruiting opportunities the Big XII would be the move where we would come in as the new Top program of the conference & would be as close to a shoo-in lock to win it on an annual basis. But the financial side would be varying & we probably wouldn’t make as much than we would going to the SEC or B1G, unless the Big XII reaches a new TV deal as well.
It depends on what’s the motivation for moving, because if we simply are looking for money, we can go to the SEC & be locked in battles for 5th place every year while be well paid lambs for slaughter, or we can go somewhere else to be a top dog in the conference but maybe not bank as much off the top as we would going to a Super conference.
It’s a matter of if we want to be a medium sized fish in an Ocean, or a Big fish in a little pond.
Have I ever mentioned how much I hate Andy Staples? His opinions are always some version of “if football programs were action figures this is the matchup that would be the mostest fun!!!!!’b’dh! huhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhuh!”
Literally he just ran through the list of ACC school with value to other conferences like 6 times on his show and not a single time mentioned Miami.
Oh and he also once listed peppermint as one of the best 5 ice creams ever. I could literally get better opinions from dog drool scraped off my pants.
Pitt as well would be a b1g institution, along with bc and wakeClemson and FSU to SEC
Miami and VT to B1G would make sense
True. I think he signed in 66, and the first sec integrated signee was in 67 or 68. But I remember reading that other sec teams weren't happy about it and didn't want to further integration and a couple of schools like Georgia held out until the early 70sThe school may have integrated in 1961 but the first African American player (Ray Bellamy) didn't take the field for UM until 1968.
Mehhh I’d rather join the big ten
Idk, maybe before but it's a different world. They took Texas in despite Texas A&M's objection. Miami would make sense for them financially- Miami draws good ratings. But i still think Big 10 would make the most sense.The only ACC team the SEC would accept is Clemson. Gates, baga, gawja, aubun and tenn would never vote for us.
FSU, and rightfully so. They’re a better fit in the SEC than we are. B1G for me please. We fit better there and will have a better chance of thriving there IMO.Who do you think the SEC takes if it came down to UM or FSU?