- Joined
- Jan 11, 2019
- Messages
- 5,085
If you'll miss them then you should miss them now. They are nothing and I don't see them becoming anything anytime soon. Beamer was a special coach.I will miss playing VT if we go to Big ten
If you'll miss them then you should miss them now. They are nothing and I don't see them becoming anything anytime soon. Beamer was a special coach.I will miss playing VT if we go to Big ten
I don’t think it’s that close from a market desirability standpoint. Anyone who thinks that the SEC “needs” Miami to help boost their imprint in SFL might be looking through orange and green lenses. UNC is actually a slam dunk for the SEC in terms of NC being a southern state that they don’t have a team in.I hear ya. And I'm not trying to argue AGAINST Miami, I'm just assessing what OTHERS think about Miami vs. UNC in the general pecking order.
I feel Miami and UNC are veryveryclose. Each of us have a couple of characteristics that the other does not have...
I don’t think it’s that close from a market desirability standpoint. Anyone who thinks that the SEC “needs” Miami to help boost their imprint in SFL might be looking through orange and green lenses. UNC is actually a slam dunk for the SEC in terms of NC being a southern state that they don’t have a team in.
I really hope the Miami-FSU rivalry can stay intact if we go to different conferences. Would be a real shame to lose that in this money grab.I will miss playing VT if we go to Big ten
Not disagreeing with what you said one bit… I can agree with you that moves are made for different reasons.I'm just going to say this, it's not directed against you or anyone in particular. I don't think people see these moves in enough directions and levels. Too many posters only see the moves on "offense", where a conference takes a school to "go somewhere" where they are not currently.
But there are also "defensive" moves to be made. While the SEC may be pretty decent in Florida, if they do NOT take Miami and/or F$U, then they give another conference an opening into their "turf".
If the SEC takes UM and F$U, they effectively lock the Big 10 out of Florida forever (unless the Big 10 takes USF). UCF is locked into the Big 12 and their 99-year GOR.
People just need to open their minds and see the entire chess board, including the moves of your opponent
They’re blinded by their whiteNot disagreeing with what you said one bit… I can agree with you that moves are made for different reasons.
I could be wrong but I just don’t believe the SEC is concerned with the Big 10, where the Big 10 may go and who they might pick up. Now, is the Big 10 concerned with what the SEC doing? Yeah, I believe that.
And when it comes SFL, a part of me believes that the demographics of that region doesn’t “fit” into who they are or their fanbases elsewhere and they are okay with that.
While I believe the SEC looks at us as an option, I don’t believe we’re as high on their board as other schools and that doesn’t have as much to do with W-L either.
I guess we’ll all see soon enough
Not disagreeing with what you said one bit… I can agree with you that moves are made for different reasons.
I could be wrong but I just don’t believe the SEC is concerned with the Big 10, where the Big 10 may go and who they might pick up. Now, is the Big 10 concerned with what the SEC doing? Yeah, I believe that.
And when it comes SFL, a part of me believes that the demographics of that region doesn’t “fit” into who they are or their fanbases elsewhere and they are okay with that.
While I believe the SEC looks at us as an option, I don’t believe we’re as high on their board as other schools and that doesn’t have as much to do with W-L either.
I guess we’ll all see soon enough
They’re blinded by their white
Yup get them back to 1950 as they try to claw back to 1860North Carolina and Virginia would give the SEC all 13 stars on the Confederate battle flag...
Yup get them back to 1950 as they try to claw back to 1860
I am not a resident of SFL nor have I ever been. And times have changed in just the last 3 years, when I’m down that way I see way more people in UM gear and with UM stuff on cars than what I saw in the late 90’s to early 2000’s.I agree with what you are saying. I think we would be #5 on the SEC generalized priority list, behind Clemson, F$U, UNC, and UVa.
But if the SEC saw the F$U-UM combo as a way to permanently lock down Florida, the third-largest state in the US (when they also own the second-largest state in the US in Texas), I think it's posssssible.
I am not a resident of SFL nor have I ever been. And times have changed in just the last 3 years, when I’m down that way I see way more people in UM gear and with UM stuff on cars than what I saw in the late 90’s to early 2000’s.
It somewhat reminds of Atlanta in the sense that even though GT is in the A… you’re definitely going to see more people in UGA **** than GT ****. Matter of fact, you’re more likely to see more FAMU stuff around the whole metro Atlanta than GT.
And to that point, I don’t think the SEC cares one bit about the ACC having GT or “locking down” the state of Georgia.
Pretty insightful video on the granting of AAU status to Miami and ND. Why it is such a big deal and how it relates to possible Big10 expansion. I'm sure many on here knew a lot of this stuff already(I did not), but they really break down a lot of the numbers across the board.
I rather us and FSU going to the same conference to because of that, and most importantly, I want to continue our annual meetings.Oh I see what you’re saying yeah, both is actually better. FSU to the SEC would hurt us more in recruiting I think looking at it this way.