Can't close Fire Banda

Who didnt he close with? A guy thats committed to another school for over a year? Or someone else?
 
Advertisement
Is it not a debate? Honest question. Has anyone done the analysis of correlating rankings to future outcomes and comapring the for the services?

For me I've been told so many times by so many different people that 247 correlates data it works for me....no I have not looked into it to that extent.
 
That's the thing...Diaz's loyalty to this Banda is gonna lead him down the same road as Richt's loyalty to guys like Jon Richt and Thomas Brown. Hope to god I'm wrong.

Seriously?

Based on what metric? Simply recruiting?

Our QB's regressed on the field and he recruited for ****. This comparison is HORRIFICALLY inaccurate.
 
Advertisement
I dont have it backwards....our O sucked a$$ but our D wasnt as good as everyone thinks. You left out BC walking up and down the field too. D is alot better than what we were used to under Donifrio. But if anyone thinks the D is championship caliber......just blinded by orange/green glasses
DT depth and LB play was the main reason why.....DB is the least of our problems defensively imo....7-6 getting our *** kicked in the $hi+ bowl by a mediocre Wisconsin team doesn't help recruiting either....those who complain about teams out recruiting us like Miss st and FSU...fail to realize they pump out 1st rounders...our top NFL prospects JoJo Jackson and Willis are projected 3rd rounders....we need to win and/or start getting those 1st rounders to improve recruiting....
 
I care about how the safeties play. They have played really good since Banda has been here. They played really bad before that.

When the safeties start playing bad, we can talk about firing Banda. Until then, these threads are dumb.

To a certain point doesnt it matter more how well guys are developing and playing[/QUOTE]
 
Cherry picking the games where we actually played a team with a half decent offense.....I am not saying the D sucked but its not all that either. What about the BC game. What about the year before against Wisky when the O game the D a 14-3 lead. The O didnt give up 333 rushing yards.


There is no way you watch the games.

You keep talking about the BC game. Again, the offense was completely inept and on top of that our QBs literally gifted them 10 points.

If you watched that game objectively you’d know BC had these scoring drives:

1 plays for 14 yards —TD
7 plays for 9 yards—FG

Despite those gifts they scored a whopping 27 points.

That was the story for literally the entire season. Like the Wisconsin and LSU games you only remember the couple of good drives they had. You forget the countless other times the defense held despite being hung out to dry possession after possession, game after game.
 
Advertisement
Seriously?

Based on what metric? Simply recruiting?

Our QB's regressed on the field and he recruited for ****. This comparison is HORRIFICALLY inaccurate.

Yes recruiting, but it could apply to other things...I tend to not think it will because we've had a good defense.

The point being loyalty can kill you for keeping bum coaches around. Obviously I didn't make the comparison with every single aspect in mind. You are right though, maybe I should have used the words "could lead him"
 
There is no way you watch the games.

You keep talking about the BC game. Again, the offense was completely inept and on top of that our QBs literally gifted them 10 points.

If you watched that game objectively you’d know BC had these scoring drives:

1 plays for 14 yards —TD
7 plays for 9 yards—FG

Despite those gifts they scored a whopping 27 points.

That was the story for literally the entire season. Like the Wisconsin and LSU games you only remember the couple of good drives they had. You forget the countless other times the defense held despite being hung out to dry possession after possession, game after game.

You are a ******* idiot to say I dont watch games and then proceed to post that BC scoring drives
1 plays for 14 yards —TD
7 plays for 9 yards—FG

But conveniently leave out the first 3 scoring drives of

10 plays 88 yards
10 plays 77 yards
21 thats right 21 ******* plays 79 yards

These were in the first half.

And the Wisky game

3 scoring drives over 50 yards and gave up 333 rushing yards....meanwhile Taylor is still tired from running all over the D

STFU
 
So you just going to ignore trajan bandy who it can be argued was tied for 1st place back their with redwine. Obviously this staff didnt bring those 3 in but you know as well as those who know football, none of the secondaries under the moron regime have ever played up to the level that these players played under coach richt or the secondaries under coach shannon.
I am no fan of any of our last four fired corches. This is a RECRUITING forum and we have been discussing talent.
 
It’s easy to say Quan was gonna be good regardless but there are plenty of 4* kids that don’t do schit in college and don’t make it to the league. Not defending their recruiting but that argument is weak.
The thing is, folks who follow FL hs fb knew Jaquan was a terrific football player, and they knew guys like loftus, hope, vernon davis, D’maury and other golden recruits would be terrible and would not play at UM. The known plugged in posters on Um and ofher boards said this early and often. I don’t understand how those guys all knew things that golden didn’t.
 
Advertisement
You are a ******* idiot to say I dont watch games and then proceed to post that BC scoring drives
1 plays for 14 yards —TD
7 plays for 9 yards—FG

But conveniently leave out the first 3 scoring drives of

10 plays 88 yards

10 plays 77 yards
21 thats right 21 ******* plays 79 yards

These were in the first half.

And the Wisky game

3 scoring drives over 50 yards and gave up 333 rushing yards....meanwhile Taylor is still tired from running all over the D

STFU



OMG I can do is after that post is to congratulate you on one of the greatest self owns I’ve ever seen on here.
 
I am no fan of any of our last four fired corches. This is a RECRUITING forum and we have been discussing talent.

Well butch davis wasnt fired and neither was coach richt, and coach scott was never offered the job, so im not sure what "4" you are referring to. But ultimately this is a football forum which covers all aspects of the program and many aspects of Life!
 
Advertisement
Yes recruiting, but it could apply to other things...I tend to not think it will because we've had a good defense.

The point being loyalty can kill you for keeping bum coaches around. Obviously I didn't make the comparison with every single aspect in mind. You are right though, maybe I should have used the words "could lead him"

You keep saying bum coaches but those coaches are turning out NFL players every year.

Sorry it does not add up.
 
on the composite rankings Quan was a 4 star. can w stop using rivals as our go to like were barry jackson? the 247 composite ranking is prolly the most accurate measure of a kids rank since its combines every recruiting service
 
You keep saying bum coaches but those coaches are turning out NFL players every year.

Sorry it does not add up.


I don’t “keep saying” anything. So just come off that

Also, i’ll let 7-9 speak slide speak for itself in response to your silly nfl players comment
 
I don’t “keep saying” anything. So just come off that

Also, i’ll let 7-9 speak slide speak for itself in response to your silly nfl players comment

They aren't turning out NFL players every year? Go ahead and prove that one wrong. Your commentary was dumb just own up to it. Comparing anyone to Jon Richt is comical.

He didn't identify talent, develop talent or recruit talent. He literally did nothing while he was here and how do we know this? He has not been hired by anyone in any capacity.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top