Canes at 6 in latest playoff ranking

Oh, princess, you were the one saying "only the final rankings matter". Now you're taking a victory lap in week 11. Except that every pundit says "look out for the SC-Clemson winner". Just wait.
You were the one who claimed they would jump them this week. They didn’t.
 
Advertisement
You never got back with me after this claim:

"Head to head matters if one team gets left out. Look at TCU and Baylor in 2014".
You’re conflating two separate topics bc you’re wrong again. Head to head matters for who gets in. If both teams are in it’s not the only factor for who gets the higher rank.

You claimed nobody flipped rankings bc of head to head. I proved you wrong with Baylor TCU.
 
If GA loses last 2 they out.
I hope so, but the committee and pollsters absolutely love UGA and Bama.

The committee is banking on UGA beating GT. Doesn't matter then if UGA loses in the SECCG. The ACC isn't getting in two teams unless both SMU and Miami win convincingly this weekend and then play a close and competitive ACCCG.

Lot of scenarios to also get Bama in, but only one needs to happen. These are somewhat realistic scenarios.

1. USC beats ND. Probably won't happen, but ND will fall out. Bama gets in.
2. Vandy beats Tenn. Again, probably won't happen, but Bama takes Tennessee's spot if that does.
3. Loser of the ACCCG is out. Bama takes that spot.
4. Boise State loses to Oregon State. Bama takes that spot if that happens.
5. Clemson beats USCe, but Bama also beats Auburn. Bama jumps Clemson since they won the "Iron Bowl"

Now if somehow TAMU beats Texas and USCe beats Clemson, we are all in for a rude awakening.
 
You’re conflating two separate topics bc you’re wrong again. Head to head matters for who gets in. If both teams are in it’s not the only factor for who gets the higher rank.

You claimed nobody flipped rankings bc of head to head. I proved you wrong with Baylor TCU.
You claimed that head to head matters when it comes down to one team getting in over another. Then you used Baylor and TCU, neither of whom got in. I still don’t think you know who made the playoffs in 2014.
 
Advertisement
You were the one who claimed they would jump them this week. They didn’t.
My claim all along has been that the winner of USC and Clemson has a shot to get in over Alabama and Ole Miss. That is now true more than it was when I wrote it now that Clemson is ahead of them.
 
You claimed that head to head matters when it comes down to one team getting in over another. Then you used Baylor and TCU, neither of whom got in. I still don’t think you know who made the playoffs in 2014.
It’s clear you don’t know an HR inf about 2014 bc you didn’t know about head to head mattering
 
If you are following the money, Cam Ward brings the eyes and the committee knows that. They want us in. Hoping for some friendly refs the next two games.

And half the country will hate watch our games just to see us lose.
 
Advertisement
Yes, the committee won't want 3 ACC teams in. USCe at 9-3 is more likely to take a potential spot than Clemson would be at 10-2.


What a ridiculous comment. Clemson is currently the FIRST TEAM OUT, and your argument is that Clemson is less likely to get in at 10-2 (after having just beaten the #15 team) than South Carolina, which would need to jump from 15 to 11 after beating Clemson.

Sure, Jan.
 
Head to head didn’t matter. Being ranked #5 and #6 in 2014 literally meant nothing.
“So you think they will flip several teams right at the end based on head to head? That's crazy talk.”

This was your argument. As I pointed out last week, it’s wrong.
 
“So you think they will flip several teams right at the end based on head to head? That's crazy talk.”

This was your argument. As I pointed out last week, it’s wrong.

Except that you specifically pointed out that you're talking about one team making it and one team being left out. And you apparently thought TCU made it in 2014.
 
What a ridiculous comment. Clemson is currently the FIRST TEAM OUT, and your argument is that Clemson is less likely to get in at 10-2 (after having just beaten the #15 team) than South Carolina, which would need to jump from 15 to 11 after beating Clemson.

Sure, Jan.
A 3 loss "SEC" team has a better chance jumping the ACC championship game loser than another ACC team that didn't even make it to the game. You would have to be at stupid piece of **** to not understand that. Send DM for further details.
 
Advertisement
A 3 loss "SEC" team has a better chance jumping the ACC championship game loser than another ACC team that didn't even make it to the game. You would have to be at stupid piece of **** to not understand that. Send DM for further details.


What a dopey post.

Re-read your stupid post again, because you just moved the goalposts and changed your argument.

Your (bull****) claim was that a 3-loss South Carolina team (coming from #15 currently, and having to beat #12 Clemson to get to 9-3) would have a "better chance" of getting in than a 10-2 Clemson (coming from #12 and having beaten #15 South Carolina). Which is just a brain-dead claim to make for the "first out" team who would knock off a similarly-ranked team (Clemson beating South Carolina).

Now you are inventing some new bull**** about "jumping the ACC championship game loser" to cover your bare ***. Ridiculous.

If Clemson beats South Carolina, they have an excellent chance to get in as the 11 seed, particularly if Texas beats Georgia in the SEC championship.

Just stop it with your belated attempts to rewrite the stupid post you made earlier.
 
What a dopey post.

Re-read your stupid post again, because you just moved the goalposts and changed your argument.

Your (bull****) claim was that a 3-loss South Carolina team (coming from #15 currently, and having to beat #12 Clemson to get to 9-3) would have a "better chance" of getting in than a 10-2 Clemson (coming from #12 and having beaten #15 South Carolina). Which is just a brain-dead claim to make for the "first out" team who would knock off a similarly-ranked team (Clemson beating South Carolina).

Now you are inventing some new bull**** about "jumping the ACC championship game loser" to cover your bare ***. Ridiculous.

If Clemson beats South Carolina, they have an excellent chance to get in as the 11 seed, particularly if Texas beats Georgia in the SEC championship.

Just stop it with your belated attempts to rewrite the stupid post you made earlier.
I'm not reading this. Either you understood or you didn't.
 
I'm not reading this. Either you understood or you didn't.


Just admit you made a dumb and factually incorrect post. It's not hard to do.

Clemson is currently the first-out at #12 (Arizona State vaults them as Big 12 champ). If #12 Clemson beats #15 South Carolina, they are very likely to be in the final Top 12 seedings.

You're just making up generalities to rile people. Ooooh, the boogey man of a "3-loss SEC team". Like the three who are ALREADY BELOW Clemson, and would not jump a #12 Clemson beating a #15 South Carolina (#13 Alabama plays unranked Auburn and #14 Ole Miss plays unranked Mississippi State).

You're talking a bunch of bull**** without providing specifics. Which is your hallmark.

Clemson beats South Carolina and nobody is jumping them. The only thing that could keep Clemson out is lower-ranked conference champs.
 
Advertisement
Just admit you made a dumb and factually incorrect post. It's not hard to do.

Clemson is currently the first-out at #12 (Arizona State vaults them as Big 12 champ). If #12 Clemson beats #15 South Carolina, they are very likely to be in the final Top 12 seedings.

You're just making up generalities to rile people. Ooooh, the boogey man of a "3-loss SEC team". Like the three who are ALREADY BELOW Clemson, and would not jump a #12 Clemson beating a #15 South Carolina (#13 Alabama plays unranked Auburn and #14 Ole Miss plays unranked Mississippi State).

You're talking a bunch of bull**** without providing specifics. Which is your hallmark.

Clemson beats South Carolina and nobody is jumping them. The only thing that could keep Clemson out is lower-ranked conference champs.
You are a joke buddy. The discussion is centered around best for Miami not who has a better shot at making the playoffs. Stay out of grown folks buisness. You always feel the need to interject some bull**** into a conversation. Stfu some times.
 
I hope so, but the committee and pollsters absolutely love UGA and Bama.

The committee is banking on UGA beating GT. Doesn't matter then if UGA loses in the SECCG. The ACC isn't getting in two teams unless both SMU and Miami win convincingly this weekend and then play a close and competitive ACCCG.

Lot of scenarios to also get Bama in, but only one needs to happen. These are somewhat realistic scenarios.

1. USC beats ND. Probably won't happen, but ND will fall out. Bama gets in.
2. Vandy beats Tenn. Again, probably won't happen, but Bama takes Tennessee's spot if that does.
3. Loser of the ACCCG is out. Bama takes that spot.
4. Boise State loses to Oregon State. Bama takes that spot if that happens.
5. Clemson beats USCe, but Bama also beats Auburn. Bama jumps Clemson since they won the "Iron Bowl"

Now if somehow TAMU beats Texas and USCe beats Clemson, we are all in for a rude awakening.
Don't think Bama gets in over the loser of the ACCCG if it's us vs SMU. It would be hard to rationalize that when both teams had only one regular season loss. Teams will not be rewarded for sitting on their asses while watching two 1 loss teams play an additional game in a conference championship. **** Bama! Saban ain't there anymore and the shine is wearing off
 
You are a joke buddy. The discussion is centered around best for Miami not who has a better shot at making the playoffs. Stay out of grown folks buisness. You always feel the need to interject some bull**** into a conversation. Stfu some times.


Hilarious.

"The discussion".

I don't care about "the discussion", I simply responded to this brain-dead porst of yours.

I don't interject any bull****, I simply rebut YOUR BULL****.


1732748308162.png
 
Advertisement
Back
Top