Yearby

[Cityboy4life82]

I already told yall why Yearby is on the back burner.

When he lost his starting job to Walton apparently he became salty and disgruntled.
At that point him and the coaching staff stopped getting along.
He revealed his intentions of leaving early to the NFL.

And here we are today, 3rd string.

Not a valid excuse to me. Gus has not shown anything. No knock on him but that is just being honest.

Move Gus to fullback/H-Back and let Yearby and Walton do what they do.

It's a perfectly valid excuse if Yearby was being a brat and Gus was working hard and staying humble.

If you have a case where your 2nd string RB is being a douche and your 3rd string RB is a hard working, humble and capable player then you shuffle the deck. It would be a slap in the face to Gus if they didn't promote him.

As starting Featured backs Yearby and Walton put up almost identical numbers. So it makes little sense arguing about who is better. Move Gus to fullback/h-back and let Yearby and Walton do their thing.

Sitting a thousand yard rusher makes no sense to me.

Identical numbers?

What numbers you looking at?

5.3 YPC is nowhere near 4.9 YPC

And SIX hundred yard games is twice as many as THREE.

Walton had 209 Carries for 1117 yards

Yearby Carries had 205 1002 yards

So to me they put up the same exact stats. Might as well have used both equally

 

[Coach Macho]

You don't have to buy it. You can shove it up your a$$ for all I care. That's from the mouth of a UM player though. Good luck with your own theories.

But what start player does not feel like they deserve more..lol If that was the case, then the coaches have to do a better job.

Just get both players on the field.

THEY WERE BOTH ON THE FIELD IN THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR!!!

His carries declined as the year went on. That's a tell tale sign of the underlying issue.

The coaches don't have to do a better job of ****. Their resume speaks for itself. They didn't have a problem distributing carries at UGA.

And they eventually were fired at UGA because of lack of production. Same sht with the last staff; thought to highly of themselves and kill the team in the process. Sometimes you need to pay attention to those outside the program to get a different view that you don't see!!!

LMAO. Dude, you embarrass yourself more and more with every post. They had the top rushing offense in the SEC in 2014.

UGA's rushing offense has always been good and their backfields are usually among the elite.

 

[Coach Macho]

Not a valid excuse to me. Gus has not shown anything. No knock on him but that is just being honest.

Move Gus to fullback/H-Back and let Yearby and Walton do what they do.

It's a perfectly valid excuse if Yearby was being a brat and Gus was working hard and staying humble.

If you have a case where your 2nd string RB is being a douche and your 3rd string RB is a hard working, humble and capable player then you shuffle the deck. It would be a slap in the face to Gus if they didn't promote him.

As starting Featured backs Yearby and Walton put up almost identical numbers. So it makes little sense arguing about who is better. Move Gus to fullback/h-back and let Yearby and Walton do their thing.

Sitting a thousand yard rusher makes no sense to me.

Identical numbers?

What numbers you looking at?

5.3 YPC is nowhere near 4.9 YPC

And SIX hundred yard games is twice as many as THREE.

Walton had 209 Carries for 1117 yards

Yearby Carries had 205 1002 yards

So to me they put up the same exact stats. Might as well have used both equally

Those aren't the same exact stats.

5.3 is much better than 4.9 and six hundred yard games is twice as good as three.

Yearby didn't have a single hundred yard performance past week 4 or against any ACC opponents.

 

[Moro]

Not a valid excuse to me. Gus has not shown anything. No knock on him but that is just being honest.

Move Gus to fullback/H-Back and let Yearby and Walton do what they do.

It's a perfectly valid excuse if Yearby was being a brat and Gus was working hard and staying humble.

If you have a case where your 2nd string RB is being a douche and your 3rd string RB is a hard working, humble and capable player then you shuffle the deck. It would be a slap in the face to Gus if they didn't promote him.

As starting Featured backs Yearby and Walton put up almost identical numbers. So it makes little sense arguing about who is better. Move Gus to fullback/h-back and let Yearby and Walton do their thing.

Sitting a thousand yard rusher makes no sense to me.

Identical numbers?

What numbers you looking at?

5.3 YPC is nowhere near 4.9 YPC

And SIX hundred yard games is twice as many as THREE.

Walton had 209 Carries for 1117 yards

Yearby Carries had 205 1002 yards

So to me they put up the same exact stats. Might as well have used both equally

Don't do that... You know Macho does x's and o's not math!!!

 

[Coach Macho]

It's a perfectly valid excuse if Yearby was being a brat and Gus was working hard and staying humble.

If you have a case where your 2nd string RB is being a douche and your 3rd string RB is a hard working, humble and capable player then you shuffle the deck. It would be a slap in the face to Gus if they didn't promote him.

As starting Featured backs Yearby and Walton put up almost identical numbers. So it makes little sense arguing about who is better. Move Gus to fullback/h-back and let Yearby and Walton do their thing.

Sitting a thousand yard rusher makes no sense to me.

Identical numbers?

What numbers you looking at?

5.3 YPC is nowhere near 4.9 YPC

And SIX hundred yard games is twice as many as THREE.

Walton had 209 Carries for 1117 yards

Yearby Carries had 205 1002 yards

So to me they put up the same exact stats. Might as well have used both equally

Don't do that... You know Macho does x's and o's not math!!!

I know 5.3 is higher than 4.9...

And 6 is greater than 3.

 

[Moro]

"He moved the chains in every game he entered."
"Nobody game planned to stop Walton."
"Yearby carried the entire team."



Holy fvck! lmao

Now you are starting to get it. You guys are insisting on turning this into a Walton vs Yearby debate. We stated from the jump that we were more interested in the story behind the demotion of Yearby to the third RB on the depth chart when it is clear as day Walton and Gus combo does not give the running game the best chances of success!

I can agree with you on this, and it was kind of odd to not see Yearby get the ball more, but Walton is the clear leader on this team. Did you see that hit Walton had on special teams... Maybe Yearby should've played more on special teams like Homer and Walton.

I loved the hit Walton had on ST. And I aint knocking Walton but I'm not going to let them snap on Yearby as tho Walton is another Cook!!!

 

[Moro]

As starting Featured backs Yearby and Walton put up almost identical numbers. So it makes little sense arguing about who is better. Move Gus to fullback/h-back and let Yearby and Walton do their thing.

Sitting a thousand yard rusher makes no sense to me.

Identical numbers?

What numbers you looking at?

5.3 YPC is nowhere near 4.9 YPC

And SIX hundred yard games is twice as many as THREE.

Walton had 209 Carries for 1117 yards

Yearby Carries had 205 1002 yards

So to me they put up the same exact stats. Might as well have used both equally

Don't do that... You know Macho does x's and o's not math!!!

I know 5.3 is higher than 4.9...

And 6 is greater than 3.

I told you he couldn't round numbers.... HEEEHHEEE.... LOL!!!

 

[Angry Ibis]

Identical numbers?

What numbers you looking at?

5.3 YPC is nowhere near 4.9 YPC

And SIX hundred yard games is twice as many as THREE.

Walton had 209 Carries for 1117 yards

Yearby Carries had 205 1002 yards

So to me they put up the same exact stats. Might as well have used both equally

Don't do that... You know Macho does x's and o's not math!!!

I know 5.3 is higher than 4.9...

And 6 is greater than 3.

I told you he couldn't round numbers.... HEEEHHEEE.... LOL!!!

So if Macho is wrong, it isn't fumbling and pass pro and it is not Gus being healthy and working hard, then what is your theory?

 

[CanesFan23]

Well I disagree about people thinking that Yearby is better are just trolling. If we are being honest Walton sucked the entire first half! I was at the game and was saying to someone if we were in need of a home run hitter this game Walton would not be it. I still couldn't believe they weren't playing Yearby. He finally enter the game in the second half. I said to someone, I bet if Yearby has any success running the ball they will pull him immediately and he won't see the field again. Sure enough, he rips off three good runs and you didn't see him the rest of the game. This was the case all year. They never wanted Yearby to out shine Walton which has been the case when given the chance. Simply, Yearby has done more with less.

Maybe Yearby requested a light load so he didn't endanger his draft status for this year?

 

[Coach Macho]

Well I disagree about people thinking that Yearby is better are just trolling. If we are being honest Walton sucked the entire first half! I was at the game and was saying to someone if we were in need of a home run hitter this game Walton would not be it. I still couldn't believe they weren't playing Yearby. He finally enter the game in the second half. I said to someone, I bet if Yearby has any success running the ball they will pull him immediately and he won't see the field again. Sure enough, he rips off three good runs and you didn't see him the rest of the game. This was the case all year. They never wanted Yearby to out shine Walton which has been the case when given the chance. Simply, Yearby has done more with less.

Maybe Yearby requested a light load so he didn't endanger his draft status for this year?

If anything he NEEDED this year to improve his draft status. Is he even on the NFL's radar right now?

 

[Moro]

Walton had 209 Carries for 1117 yards

Yearby Carries had 205 1002 yards

So to me they put up the same exact stats. Might as well have used both equally

Don't do that... You know Macho does x's and o's not math!!!

I know 5.3 is higher than 4.9...

And 6 is greater than 3.

I told you he couldn't round numbers.... HEEEHHEEE.... LOL!!!

So if Macho is wrong, it isn't fumbling and pass pro and it is not Gus being healthy and working hard, then what is your theory?

I don't think that every story has to be negative. And we all make mistakes including coaches. The way the Coaches have handled this makes this worst than what it probably is but once again a good kid loses in the end. Obviously, this becomes a red flag on Yearby no matter which decision he decides and that is unfortunate because it all could have been handled in a much more professional manner so that both sides win and the athletes future is not jeopardized in the process.

 

[BigDikCane]

You don't have to buy it. You can shove it up your a$$ for all I care. That's from the mouth of a UM player though. Good luck with your own theories.

But what start player does not feel like they deserve more..lol If that was the case, then the coaches have to do a better job.

Just get both players on the field.

Come on mane, you know you have to play Rudy over Ndamukon Suh b/c he practiced hard.

 

[Angry Ibis]

Don't do that... You know Macho does x's and o's not math!!!

I know 5.3 is higher than 4.9...

And 6 is greater than 3.

I told you he couldn't round numbers.... HEEEHHEEE.... LOL!!!

So if Macho is wrong, it isn't fumbling and pass pro and it is not Gus being healthy and working hard, then what is your theory?

I don't think that there every story has to be negative. And we all make mistakes including coaches. The way the Coaches have handled this makes this worst than what it probably is but once again a good kid loses in the end. Obviously, this becomes a red flag on Yearby no matter which decision he decides and that is unfortunate because it all could have been handled in a much more professional manner so that both sides win and the athletes future is not jeopardized in the process.

You obviously think this is negative by the section not highlighted. What was handled poorly - we won the last five games?

 

[dycane]

Yearby may be the slowest running back I have ever seen on a Miami roster. He's also a horrific blocker. Dude has no business playing significant minutes on this team. Wish him the best of luck.

 

[Moro]

I know 5.3 is higher than 4.9...

And 6 is greater than 3.

I told you he couldn't round numbers.... HEEEHHEEE.... LOL!!!

So if Macho is wrong, it isn't fumbling and pass pro and it is not Gus being healthy and working hard, then what is your theory?

I don't think that there every story has to be negative. And we all make mistakes including coaches. The way the Coaches have handled this makes this worst than what it probably is but once again a good kid loses in the end. Obviously, this becomes a red flag on Yearby no matter which decision he decides and that is unfortunate because it all could have been handled in a much more professional manner so that both sides win and the athletes future is not jeopardized in the process.

You obviously think this is negative by the section not highlighted. What was handled poorly - we won the last five games?

I will say this in most cases including with this staff and team you will find that if a player is disciplined he pays the penalty and there is an apology extended to the team and coaches. However, if the Coaches are in the wrong rarely is there a Coach man enough to stand and admit their decisions were wrong regardless of the impact on the player and if they do it's years later when it doesn't even matter at that point which is unfortunate.

 

[BigDikCane]

Yearby may be the slowest running back I have ever seen on a Miami roster. He's also a horrific blocker. Dude has no business playing significant minutes on this team. Wish him the best of luck.

lol.. nah mane the only thing I can say about Yearby is that he'll get you those 4 and 5 yards on a consistent basis... He's not a home run threat but he can move the chains. Thats the reason why he started over Dalvin Cook in highschool.

 

[Angry Ibis]

I told you he couldn't round numbers.... HEEEHHEEE.... LOL!!!

So if Macho is wrong, it isn't fumbling and pass pro and it is not Gus being healthy and working hard, then what is your theory?

I don't think that there every story has to be negative. And we all make mistakes including coaches. The way the Coaches have handled this makes this worst than what it probably is but once again a good kid loses in the end. Obviously, this becomes a red flag on Yearby no matter which decision he decides and that is unfortunate because it all could have been handled in a much more professional manner so that both sides win and the athletes future is not jeopardized in the process.

You obviously think this is negative by the section not highlighted. What was handled poorly - we won the last five games?

I will say this in most cases including with this staff and team you will find that if a player is disciplined he pays the penalty and there is an apology extended to the team and coaches. However, if the Coaches are in the wrong rarely is there a Coach man enough to stand and admit their decisions were wrong regardless of the impact on the player and if they do it's years later when it doesn't even matter at that point which is unfortunate.

Coaches and the University are going to apologize for winning the last 5 games because they played someone other than the player you wanted them to play? Players have been disciplined all season. I'm sure the public didn't see the details of all of those situations.

 

[Moro]

So if Macho is wrong, it isn't fumbling and pass pro and it is not Gus being healthy and working hard, then what is your theory?

I don't think that there every story has to be negative. And we all make mistakes including coaches. The way the Coaches have handled this makes this worst than what it probably is but once again a good kid loses in the end. Obviously, this becomes a red flag on Yearby no matter which decision he decides and that is unfortunate because it all could have been handled in a much more professional manner so that both sides win and the athletes future is not jeopardized in the process.

You obviously think this is negative by the section not highlighted. What was handled poorly - we won the last five games?

I will say this in most cases including with this staff and team you will find that if a player is disciplined he pays the penalty and there is an apology extended to the team and coaches. However, if the Coaches are in the wrong rarely is there a Coach man enough to stand and admit their decisions were wrong regardless of the impact on the player and if they do it's years later when it doesn't even matter at that point which is unfortunate.

Coaches and the University are going to apologize for winning the last 5 games because they played someone other than the player you wanted them to play? Players have been disciplined all season. I'm sure the public didn't see the details of all of those situations.

Who's asking for an apology for winning? Players have been disciplined all season and you heard about everyone of them.... Now most people become suspicious when you can't seem to get a story together surrounding Yearby's deal. We also know that people tend to not want to talk about issues beyond a certain point when they are in the wrong especially when they hold all the authority. ie Saban, Kirby etc...

 

[Coach Macho]

Don't do that... You know Macho does x's and o's not math!!!

I know 5.3 is higher than 4.9...

And 6 is greater than 3.

I told you he couldn't round numbers.... HEEEHHEEE.... LOL!!!

So if Macho is wrong, it isn't fumbling and pass pro and it is not Gus being healthy and working hard, then what is your theory?

I don't think that there every story has to be negative. And we all make mistakes including coaches. The way the Coaches have handled this makes this worst than what it probably is but once again a good kid loses in the end. Obviously, this becomes a red flag on Yearby no matter which decision he decides and that is unfortunate because it all could have been handled in a much more professional manner so that both sides win and the athletes future is not jeopardized in the process.

YOU
DON'T
KNOW
WHAT
HAPPENED

So how the **** can you possibly know how it should be handled?
And you also don't know how good of a kid Yearby is.

This whole thread, you've been spouting off assumptions.

 

[Angry Ibis]

I don't think that there every story has to be negative. And we all make mistakes including coaches. The way the Coaches have handled this makes this worst than what it probably is but once again a good kid loses in the end. Obviously, this becomes a red flag on Yearby no matter which decision he decides and that is unfortunate because it all could have been handled in a much more professional manner so that both sides win and the athletes future is not jeopardized in the process.

You obviously think this is negative by the section not highlighted. What was handled poorly - we won the last five games?

I will say this in most cases including with this staff and team you will find that if a player is disciplined he pays the penalty and there is an apology extended to the team and coaches. However, if the Coaches are in the wrong rarely is there a Coach man enough to stand and admit their decisions were wrong regardless of the impact on the player and if they do it's years later when it doesn't even matter at that point which is unfortunate.

Coaches and the University are going to apologize for winning the last 5 games because they played someone other than the player you wanted them to play? Players have been disciplined all season. I'm sure the public didn't see the details of all of those situations.

Who's asking for an apology for winning? Players have been disciplined all season and you heard about everyone of them.... Now most people become suspicious when you can't seem to get a story together surrounding Yearby's deal. We also know that people tend to not want to talk about issues beyond a certain point when they are in the wrong especially when they hold all the authority.

You still haven't answered what your theory is. Seems like you are the one with the suspicions. I watched the games, saw adjustments, losses, wins, etc., but didn't do it looking for the ghosts of running backs yet to come.