Why N'Kosi Perry will be Starting QB

[dukebeeasy305]

Just ask yourselves this.. If Richt doesn't use him with some designed run plays throughout the game how ****ed off will you be?

Not at all, because he's not a dual threat QB. Michael Vick was a dual threat QB. To me a dual threat QB is one the D always has to be worried about tucking the ball and running with it. Perry simply didn't have the yards in high school to suggest he is a threat to run it. Can he escape pressure and make plays? Yes. Will it be by tearing off 20 yard runs 2-3 times a game? Nope.

Escaping pressure and being mobile does not make you a threat to run the ball. It just keeps the QB upright longer to make a play down the field. In my opinion that is all we need from him. That and the guts to run for 4 yards on 3rd and 3 from time to time.

It's just non-sense saying a QB is dual threat because he can pass AND make a guy miss... and pass.

You've hit on a key point. If the defense you're going to be playing against doesn't have to game plan the fact that you're a consistent threat run the ball, then you're not a dual threat quarterback. And if high school defenses weren't game planning for Perry to be a dual threat, college defenses won't either, unless he shows that he is a consistent runner several times a game. Which he won't. Nor do we want him to. End of story.

exactly.

They will gameplan against him in the run game from day one.. Richt said himself that he wants to have some one under center that brings the threat of running so the end or assigned man doesn't just collapse on the RB in the read option aspect of the RPO he runs (Yes I know what RPO is and yes there are some read option concepts built into it). I also find it hilarious that you guys think he would be able to escape pressure manipulate the secondary with his eyes or whatever else y'all said he can manipulate with throw pin point passes on the run against elite competition but somehow he doesn't have the athleticism to run for at a minimum 5-7 yards per rush if he decided to take off more.. The first time he does all that and throws an incomplete pass or worse we will lose our ****

 

[Ice Cube]

Richt is a poor play caller. If Perry starts, we are in serious TROUBLE! Perry is a talented QB and his talent should not be wasted on Richt's uninspired and questionable play-calling. My Guess (or at least my prayer): UM Hires a Competent Play-Calling Offensive Coordinator for 2018.

 

[No_Fly_Zone]

Richt is a poor play caller. If Perry starts, we are in serious TROUBLE! Perry is a talented QB and his talent should not be wasted on Richt's uninspired and questionable play-calling. My Guess (or at least my prayer): UM Hires a Competent Play-Calling Offensive Coordinator for 2018.

Go back to your cave, troll! There are no children for you to steal away here! And the adults will not feed you... Shoo!!!

 

[D_G87]

LOL

Richt is a poor play caller. If Perry starts, we are in serious TROUBLE! Perry is a talented QB and his talent should not be wasted on Richt's uninspired and questionable play-calling. My Guess (or at least my prayer): UM Hires a Competent Play-Calling Offensive Coordinator for 2018.

 

[hesskilla]

I said I didn't want to hear it, not that you didn't have the right to. You can cry your eyes out for all I care, and you probably will.

Let me simplify this for you. Nobody in life should be above constructive criticism. I consider people who blindly follow something without asking questions to be ignorant. Mark Richt was a below average play caller at times last year, we can do better than BB at punt returner, and we should have landed Chris Henderson last year. These are debatable and should be constructively criticized. Lastly, THIS IS THE PLACE TO OFFER YOUR CRITICISM ABOUT THOSE TOPICS. Whining about others using this forum to criticize and whine makes you look uneducated.

I'm done.

 

[Ice Cube]

LOL

Richt is a poor play caller. If Perry starts, we are in serious TROUBLE! Perry is a talented QB and his talent should not be wasted on Richt's uninspired and questionable play-calling. My Guess (or at least my prayer): UM Hires a Competent Play-Calling Offensive Coordinator for 2018.

Just being honest. Since E.Sheriffs and M.Rosier have faced College Defenses (albeit in only 2 real games and practice) for several years, they are better prepared deal with MR's uninspired and questionable play-calling. The Anointing of Perry is ridiculous at this point. HE MAY NEED TIME...which is okay.

 

[Ice Cube]

I said I didn't want to hear it, not that you didn't have the right to. You can cry your eyes out for all I care, and you probably will.

Let me simplify this for you. Nobody in life should be above constructive criticism. I consider people who blindly follow something without asking questions to be ignorant. Mark Richt was a below average play caller at times last year, we can do better than BB at punt returner, and we should have landed Chris Henderson last year. These are debatable and should be constructively criticized. Lastly, THIS IS THE PLACE TO OFFER YOUR CRITICISM ABOUT THOSE TOPICS. Whining about others using this forum to criticize and whine makes you look uneducated.

I'm done.

I agree. Too many in here that can't handle the Truth about Richt.

 

[D_G87]

lol cmon man. His first year calling plays in a while with a roster he didn't inherit, suspect OL play most of the year, a non mobile QB. Richt isn't an Elite play caller but we could have so much worse. We had 3 or 4 playmakers on O and that's it. He could be more inventive, but he's far from trash playcaller

LOL

Richt is a poor play caller. If Perry starts, we are in serious TROUBLE! Perry is a talented QB and his talent should not be wasted on Richt's uninspired and questionable play-calling. My Guess (or at least my prayer): UM Hires a Competent Play-Calling Offensive Coordinator for 2018.

Just being honest. Since E.Sheriffs and M.Rosier have faced College Defenses (albeit in only 2 real games and practice) for several years, they are better prepared deal with MR's uninspired and questionable play-calling. The Anointing of Perry is ridiculous at this point. HE MAY NEED TIME...which is okay.

 

[Ice Cube]

lol cmon man. His first year calling plays in a while with a roster he didn't inherit, suspect OL play most of the year, a non mobile QB. Richt isn't an Elite play caller but we could have so much worse. We had 3 or 4 playmakers on O and that's it. He could be more inventive, but he's far from trash playcaller

LOL

Richt is a poor play caller. If Perry starts, we are in serious TROUBLE! Perry is a talented QB and his talent should not be wasted on Richt's uninspired and questionable play-calling. My Guess (or at least my prayer): UM Hires a Competent Play-Calling Offensive Coordinator for 2018.

Just being honest. Since E.Sheriffs and M.Rosier have faced College Defenses (albeit in only 2 real games and practice) for several years, they are better prepared deal with MR's uninspired and questionable play-calling. The Anointing of Perry is ridiculous at this point. HE MAY NEED TIME...which is okay.

You say "his first year calling plays in a while" like that is a justifiable excuse for Richt's uninspired and questionable play-calling. LMAO You can miss me with that BS. UM did not give him 4mill+ for him to shake off rust. I am not cutting him any slack. HE CHOSE TO CALL PLAYS and he was mediocre. Suspect OL? There would not have been a Suspect OLine IF THE PROPER PERSONNEL WAS USED....which was finally used ONLY AFTER INJURIES FORCED IT. THAT IS ALL ON COACHING. Playmakers.....Seriously? FSU had ONE Playmaker. Yet, you said we had 3 - 4. Nice Call.

 

[No_Fly_Zone]

Uhh... so stupid. I said I wouldn't but they dragged me in...

UM Team Statistics (2015 season on left, 2016 season on right)

Scoring: Points/Game 27.8 34.3
Scoring: Games - Points 13 - 361 13 - 446
First Downs: Total 249 261
Rushing: Yards / Attempt 3.68 4.54
Passing: Rating 136.29 149.64
Passing: Yards 3602 3564
Total Offense: Yards / Play 5.91 6.43
Time of Possession / Game 29:55.15 27:58.77
3rd Down Conversions: 34.97% 36.26%
4th Down Conversions: 72.22% 46.15%
Red Zone Success: 81.67% 81.48%

Passing offense rank in 2016 (by yards): 27/128
Rushing offense rank in 2016 (by yards): 93/128
Overall offense rank in 2016 (by yards): 53/128

So overall, Mark Richt, in his first season calling plays in 10 years managed to improve the offense in most statistical categories. Was Mark Richt a perfect play caller (or even a great play caller) last season? No. Were there occasional head-scratching calls on offense last season? Yes. Were we mostly a middle of the pack offense last year? Yes. But is Mark Richt a "poor play caller?" The evidence from last season seems to suggest he is not.

And as an afterthought, to [MENTION=9406]hesskilla[/MENTION], not all criticism (even honest criticism) is constructive. Constructive criticism generally includes tips and suggestions for improvement. For example, "hey [MENTION=17246]Ice Cube[/MENTION], people might not think you were being an obnoxious troll if you included more support for your arguments. Maybe if you included specific examples of perceived instances of CMR's poor play calling or offensive statistics from last season to support your argument, you'd get a better response and people wouldn't think you lived under a bridge in Switzerland."

So while I agree with you that nobody is above constructive criticism, I don't think any of the above criticisms of CMR or the players addressed can be considered "constructive." And most of it can't even be fairly considered supported or well-reasoned.

 

[Ice Cube]

Uhh... so stupid. I said I wouldn't but they dragged me in...

UM Team Statistics (2015 season on left, 2016 season on right)

Scoring: Points/Game 27.8 34.3
Scoring: Games - Points 13 - 361 13 - 446
First Downs: Total 249 261
Rushing: Yards / Attempt 3.68 4.54
Passing: Rating 136.29 149.64
Passing: Yards 3602 3564
Total Offense: Yards / Play 5.91 6.43
Time of Possession / Game 29:55.15 27:58.77
3rd Down Conversions: 34.97% 36.26%
4th Down Conversions: 72.22% 46.15%
Red Zone Success: 81.67% 81.48%

Passing offense rank in 2016 (by yards): 27/128
Rushing offense rank in 2016 (by yards): 93/128
Overall offense rank in 2016 (by yards): 53/128

So overall, Mark Richt, in his first season calling plays in 10 years managed to improve the offense in most statistical categories. Was Mark Richt a perfect play caller (or even a great play caller) last season? No. Were there occasional head-scratching calls on offense last season? Yes. Were we mostly a middle of the pack offense last year? Yes. But is Mark Richt a "poor play caller?" The evidence from last season seems to suggest he is not.

And as an afterthought, to [MENTION=9406]hesskilla[/MENTION], not all criticism (even honest criticism) is constructive. Constructive criticism generally includes tips and suggestions for improvement. For example, "hey [MENTION=17246]Ice Cube[/MENTION], people might not think you were being an obnoxious troll if you included more support for your arguments. Maybe if you included specific examples of perceived instances of CMR's poor play calling or offensive statistics from last season to support your argument, you'd get a better response and people wouldn't think you lived under a bridge in Switzerland."

So while I agree with you that nobody is above constructive criticism, I don't think any of the above criticisms of CMR or the players addressed can be considered "constructive." And most of it can't even be fairly considered supported or well-reasoned.

Those stats do not tell the Entire Story, Smart Guy. We were coached by Phucking Al Golden in 2015. Richt was supposed to be better. Yet, the difference in 2016 was only marginal as a whole. Kaaya looked like he took a step back in 2016. BK never looked comfortable...although he had good stats. Why?

 

[No_Fly_Zone]

Uhh... so stupid. I said I wouldn't but they dragged me in...

UM Team Statistics (2015 season on left, 2016 season on right)

Scoring: Points/Game 27.8 34.3
Scoring: Games - Points 13 - 361 13 - 446
First Downs: Total 249 261
Rushing: Yards / Attempt 3.68 4.54
Passing: Rating 136.29 149.64
Passing: Yards 3602 3564
Total Offense: Yards / Play 5.91 6.43
Time of Possession / Game 29:55.15 27:58.77
3rd Down Conversions: 34.97% 36.26%
4th Down Conversions: 72.22% 46.15%
Red Zone Success: 81.67% 81.48%

Passing offense rank in 2016 (by yards): 27/128
Rushing offense rank in 2016 (by yards): 93/128
Overall offense rank in 2016 (by yards): 53/128

So overall, Mark Richt, in his first season calling plays in 10 years managed to improve the offense in most statistical categories. Was Mark Richt a perfect play caller (or even a great play caller) last season? No. Were there occasional head-scratching calls on offense last season? Yes. Were we mostly a middle of the pack offense last year? Yes. But is Mark Richt a "poor play caller?" The evidence from last season seems to suggest he is not.

And as an afterthought, to [MENTION=9406]hesskilla[/MENTION], not all criticism (even honest criticism) is constructive. Constructive criticism generally includes tips and suggestions for improvement. For example, "hey [MENTION=17246]Ice Cube[/MENTION], people might not think you were being an obnoxious troll if you included more support for your arguments. Maybe if you included specific examples of perceived instances of CMR's poor play calling or offensive statistics from last season to support your argument, you'd get a better response and people wouldn't think you lived under a bridge in Switzerland."

So while I agree with you that nobody is above constructive criticism, I don't think any of the above criticisms of CMR or the players addressed can be considered "constructive." And most of it can't even be fairly considered supported or well-reasoned.

Those stats do not tell the Entire Story, Smart Guy. We were coached by Phucking Al Golden in 2015. Richt was supposed to be better. Yet, the difference in 2016 was only marginal as whole. Kaaya looked like he took a step back in 2016. BK never looked comfortable...although he had good stats. Why?

1. Richt was better (than James Coley, FYI, the offensive coordinator calling the plays in 2015). That is indisputable.

2. Other than wins and losses, no stats tell the entire story, tough guy. But I came with some factual support for my argument, instead of just my limp d1ck in my hand. Evolve or GTFO.

3. Brad never looked comfortable because, despite his intelligence and arm talent, he is an immobile statue of a QB with issues below the waste and our offensive line did a below average job of protecting him most of the year, which clearly got to Brad at times. For better or worse, he is the precise type of QB college football (and coaches like CMR) has moved away from.

 

[ScharfCane]

Uhh... so stupid. I said I wouldn't but they dragged me in...

UM Team Statistics (2015 season on left, 2016 season on right)

Scoring: Points/Game 27.8 34.3
Scoring: Games

And no matter who the QB is, when the entire coaching staff is replaced, it takes time for the offense to relearn the offense. Not an easy task for the players.

 

[hesskilla]

[MENTION=16095]No_Fly_Zone[/MENTION]

You make some good points. I think overall it was a better season for us offensively than the previous year. However, just because it was better than the previous year doesn't mean that it was good enough. This is especially true for games like Virginia Tech. In my post I stated that he was below average at times. This is one of those "times"

You are absolutely right about the way Ice Cube is presenting his argument. It isn't very constructive, but is that any worse than complaining about complaining? Or telling me that I'm not allowed to complain in the future? That's the whole reason I posted in the first place.

 

[KevinCaneFace]

Uhh... so stupid. I said I wouldn't but they dragged me in...

UM Team Statistics (2015 season on left, 2016 season on right)

Scoring: Points/Game 27.8 34.3
Scoring: Games - Points 13 - 361 13 - 446
First Downs: Total 249 261
Rushing: Yards / Attempt 3.68 4.54
Passing: Rating 136.29 149.64
Passing: Yards 3602 3564
Total Offense: Yards / Play 5.91 6.43
Time of Possession / Game 29:55.15 27:58.77
3rd Down Conversions: 34.97% 36.26%
4th Down Conversions: 72.22% 46.15%
Red Zone Success: 81.67% 81.48%

Passing offense rank in 2016 (by yards): 27/128
Rushing offense rank in 2016 (by yards): 93/128
Overall offense rank in 2016 (by yards): 53/128

So overall, Mark Richt, in his first season calling plays in 10 years managed to improve the offense in most statistical categories. Was Mark Richt a perfect play caller (or even a great play caller) last season? No. Were there occasional head-scratching calls on offense last season? Yes. Were we mostly a middle of the pack offense last year? Yes. But is Mark Richt a "poor play caller?" The evidence from last season seems to suggest he is not.

And as an afterthought, to [MENTION=9406]hesskilla[/MENTION], not all criticism (even honest criticism) is constructive. Constructive criticism generally includes tips and suggestions for improvement. For example, "hey [MENTION=17246]Ice Cube[/MENTION], people might not think you were being an obnoxious troll if you included more support for your arguments. Maybe if you included specific examples of perceived instances of CMR's poor play calling or offensive statistics from last season to support your argument, you'd get a better response and people wouldn't think you lived under a bridge in Switzerland."

So while I agree with you that nobody is above constructive criticism, I don't think any of the above criticisms of CMR or the players addressed can be considered "constructive." And most of it can't even be fairly considered supported or well-reasoned.

Those stats do not tell the Entire Story, Smart Guy. We were coached by Phucking Al Golden in 2015. Richt was supposed to be better. Yet, the difference in 2016 was only marginal as a whole. Kaaya looked like he took a step back in 2016. BK never looked comfortable...although he had good stats. Why?

But yet, Kaaya had better stats in practically every passing stat in 2016 then he did in 2015 or 2014 under James Coley. So, he may have "looked" like he took a step back but he did not.

 

[The Franchise]

So Rick is a better play caller than Georgia's WR coach? I'm comforted. Thanks.

 

[No_Fly_Zone]

[MENTION=16095]No_Fly_Zone[/MENTION]

You make some good points. I think overall it was a better season for us offensively than the previous year. However, just because it was better than the previous year doesn't mean that it was good enough. This is especially true for games like Virginia Tech. In my post I stated that he was below average at times. This is one of those "times"

You are absolutely right about the way Ice Cube is presenting his argument. It isn't very constructive, but is that any worse than complaining about complaining? Or telling me that I'm not allowed to complain in the future? That's the whole reason I posted in the first place.

I hear you and mostly agree with where you are coming from. I think we're (mostly) just hoping for continued improvement this year.
Respect.

 

[No_Fly_Zone]

So Rick is a better play caller than Georgia's WR coach? I'm comforted. Thanks.

I actually lol'd on that one.

 

[Ice Cube]

Uhh... so stupid. I said I wouldn't but they dragged me in...

UM Team Statistics (2015 season on left, 2016 season on right)

Scoring: Points/Game 27.8 34.3
Scoring: Games - Points 13 - 361 13 - 446
First Downs: Total 249 261
Rushing: Yards / Attempt 3.68 4.54
Passing: Rating 136.29 149.64
Passing: Yards 3602 3564
Total Offense: Yards / Play 5.91 6.43
Time of Possession / Game 29:55.15 27:58.77
3rd Down Conversions: 34.97% 36.26%
4th Down Conversions: 72.22% 46.15%
Red Zone Success: 81.67% 81.48%

Passing offense rank in 2016 (by yards): 27/128
Rushing offense rank in 2016 (by yards): 93/128
Overall offense rank in 2016 (by yards): 53/128

So overall, Mark Richt, in his first season calling plays in 10 years managed to improve the offense in most statistical categories. Was Mark Richt a perfect play caller (or even a great play caller) last season? No. Were there occasional head-scratching calls on offense last season? Yes. Were we mostly a middle of the pack offense last year? Yes. But is Mark Richt a "poor play caller?" The evidence from last season seems to suggest he is not.

And as an afterthought, to [MENTION=9406]hesskilla[/MENTION], not all criticism (even honest criticism) is constructive. Constructive criticism generally includes tips and suggestions for improvement. For example, "hey [MENTION=17246]Ice Cube[/MENTION], people might not think you were being an obnoxious troll if you included more support for your arguments. Maybe if you included specific examples of perceived instances of CMR's poor play calling or offensive statistics from last season to support your argument, you'd get a better response and people wouldn't think you lived under a bridge in Switzerland."

So while I agree with you that nobody is above constructive criticism, I don't think any of the above criticisms of CMR or the players addressed can be considered "constructive." And most of it can't even be fairly considered supported or well-reasoned.

Those stats do not tell the Entire Story, Smart Guy. We were coached by Phucking Al Golden in 2015. Richt was supposed to be better. Yet, the difference in 2016 was only marginal as whole. Kaaya looked like he took a step back in 2016. BK never looked comfortable...although he had good stats. Why?

1. Richt was better (than James Coley, FYI, the offensive coordinator calling the plays in 2015). That is indisputable.

2. Other than wins and losses, no stats tell the entire story, tough guy. But I came with some factual support for my argument, instead of just my limp d1ck in my hand. Evolve or GTFO.

3. Brad never looked comfortable because, despite his intelligence and arm talent, he is an immobile statue of a QB with issues below the waste and our offensive line did a below average job of protecting him most of the year, which clearly got to Brad at times. For better or worse, he is the precise type of QB college football (and coaches like CMR) has moved away from.

You have not proved anything. Again, we were marginally better as a whole in 2016. As Franchise said, I take no pleasure in our head coach being marginally better than Georgia's wide receivers coach.

 

[ThomasM]

I said I didn't want to hear it, not that you didn't have the right to. You can cry your eyes out for all I care, and you probably will.

Let me simplify this for you. Nobody in life should be above constructive criticism. I consider people who blindly follow something without asking questions to be ignorant. Mark Richt was a below average play caller at times last year, we can do better than BB at punt returner, and we should have landed Chris Henderson last year. These are debatable and should be constructively criticized. Lastly, THIS IS THE PLACE TO OFFER YOUR CRITICISM ABOUT THOSE TOPICS. Whining about others using this forum to criticize and whine makes you look uneducated.

I'm done.

I'm specifically talking about bashing a kid that hasn't played a down yet. Be critical of the coaching staff all you want, and I agree, they need to be held accountable. This thread is about Perry, not the coaching staff. He's a young man with a bight future, but some people will bash him if he doesn't set the world on fire from day one. I want THOSE PEOPLE IN PARTICULAR to not bash the guy.

Reading comprehension is your friend.