forums

Transfer Portal watch

Advertisement
dycane said:
Of course it is. And what you just typed makes no sense.
Click to expand...
Everything you type literally makes no sense. Do you ever wonder why everyone you respond to gets 4 thumbs up and no one ever likes your posts? It's because you are delusional. This is good for football. In a hyper market where coaches are fired left and right and new coaches come with new schemes or styles, it's the best market we got which fits the times.
 
fincane said:
Allowing a player to transfer is about the athlete getting a chance to go somewhere else if they don't like their current situation. That is all it is for. You can't change that on the basis of Alabama and Georgia keep getting the best players so we have to make it more difficult for them. Thats what a pro league does for parity. And until the NCAA does thing like institute a salary cap and a draft you can forget about rules that limit player movement being put in place for competitive balance.
Click to expand...
Change it? It was the rule up until the flu-by-another-name epidemic and there were solid reasons supporting it. The reasoning in support is even stronger now. It is one of the few things the NCAA can do to reign this nonsense in. It's not about competitive balance. What the **** are you talking about?
 
dycane said:
Change it? It was the rule up until the flu-by-another-name epidemic and there were solid reasons supporting it. The reasoning in support is even stronger now. It is one of the few things the NCAA can do to reign this nonsense in. It's not about competitive balance. What the **** are you talking about?
Click to expand...
It was the rule until the NCAA loss the backing on the governmental level. There were real questions being asked about how an entity promoting amateurism could have rules in place that limit player movement like a pro league does. The NCAA's job is to catch the schools doing the tampering not revert back because they can't control their own institutions.

And why is the one-year rule better for the sport? Elias Ricks can't leave for Alabama and play in 2022 after his coaches got fired because...? Michigan State went 10-2 on the back of transfers. A school who hired a coach after February signing day in 2020 was able to make up for it with portal kids and had a great 2021. Kenneth Walker transfers from Wake and becomes an All-American at Michigan State. Wake seemed to do just fine without him too. Miami was in the top ten for most of the year in 2020 because of a transfer QB. I'm supposed to believe that is bad for the sport?
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
Advertisement
I see a lot of transfers. what happened to the sit out a year unless you a grad transfer or coach left rule? When did that change?
 
Advertisement
fincane said:
Allowing a player to transfer is about the athlete getting a chance to go somewhere else if they don't like their current situation. That is all it is for. You can't change that on the basis of Alabama and Georgia keep getting the best players so we have to make it more difficult for them. Thats what a pro league does for parity. And until the NCAA does thing like institute a salary cap and a draft you can forget about rules that limit player movement being put in place for competitive balance.
Click to expand...
Except that was the rule for a long time so of course it could be put back in place..
 
jhtheking said:
Except that was the rule for a long time so of course it could be put back in place..
Click to expand...
Unlikely. They didn't remove the rule because they were being good guys. They removed it because the tide had turned against them. Not much fight left in the NCAA
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back
Top