NY Shyne
Canes fan since Slick Rick’s first chain…
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2012
- Messages
- 939
There are Coley haters that defend D'onfrio?
That just made my hangover 10X worse.
There are Coley haters that defend D'onfrio?
If you look at the numbers in total, our offense/QB play was about equal this year to last year.are there really coley haters? can we all agree our offense, and our QB play was much better when fisch was here?
OP is doing great work in this thread.
If you don't think Golden has thrown Coley and the offense under the bus in order to protect his friend and the defense then you're not paying attention.
We were basically an "all or nothing" offense. To be fair, a lot of that was due to our QB + Duke's injury.If you look at the numbers in total, our offense/QB play was about equal this year to last year.are there really coley haters? can we all agree our offense, and our QB play was much better when fisch was here?
The key difference is that if you look (especially at Morris' numbers), the offense got better as the year went on under Fisch in his last season before bolting to the Jags. Under Coley this past year, it regressed.
The explosive plays were there against F$U/VT/Duke/Pitt/UVA as they were most of the year, but we couldn't convert on 3rd down nor possess the football nearly as well as earlier in the year. Look at the splits:
Aug/Sept (FAU/UF/Sav St/USF) - 37.5% on 3rd down
Oct (GT/UNC/Wake) - 46% on 3rd down
Nov (F$U/VT/Duke/UVA/Pitt) - 32.8% on 3rd down
Dec (Louisville) - 0.00% on 3rd down
You don't win many ballgames with a 3rd down percentage approaching John Blutarsky's GPA at Faber College.
And to show I'm not a complete prick--here's the same split stats defensively (where we sucked as well):
Aug/Sept (FAU/UF/Sav St/USF) - 26% on 3rd down
Oct (GT/UNC/Wake) - 40% on 3rd down
Nov (F$U/VT/Duke/UVA/Pitt) - 54% on 3rd down
Dec (Louisville) - 57% on 3rd down
The O couldn't stay on the field enough (especially in the bowl game), and the D couldn't get off of it enough (especially in the bowl game). Recipe for disaster, no matter how you want to frame it, or who you want to blame for it.
All I have a problem with is the OP trying to say the offense was good when they were provably not as good as most would think. They were explosive and made pretty plays, but this is not a good pro-style offense, like we're supposed to be (just as the D isn't attacking and aggressive, as they should be). That's my fundamental gripe with the premise of this cat's line of thought.OP is doing great work in this thread.
If you don't think Golden has thrown Coley and the offense under the bus in order to protect his friend and the defense then you're not paying attention.
Yeah I think they are arguing past each other and BWCD doesn't want to concede the point the OP made.
I don't think it makes much sense to judge Coley based on last season.
It was his first time calling plays. He had major injuries to key offensive personnel. He had an incompetent QB. He had a horrid defense putting his unit in bad situations (often).
Could the offense have been better? Of course. But that doesn't mean Coley isn't going to develop into a stud of an OC (or HC, for that matter). Time will tell.
Given the circumstances, and short time frame, it just isn't fair to judge him (for better or worse) yet.
quick question, who are the Duke's and Coley's talent equivalent on defense? Or at least close to them?
quick question, who are the Duke's and Coley's talent equivalent on defense? Or at least close to them?
Quick question, what happened to that "top 30 defense" that was suppose to break some ****** record?
I don't think it makes much sense to judge Coley based on last season.
It was his first time calling plays. He had major injuries to key offensive personnel. He had an incompetent QB. He had a horrid defense putting his unit in bad situations (often).
Could the offense have been better? Of course. But that doesn't mean Coley isn't going to develop into a stud of an OC (or HC, for that matter). Time will tell.
Given the circumstances, and short time frame, it just isn't fair to judge him (for better or worse) yet.
1) It wasn't his first time calling plays. He was the OC at FIU under Cristobal for the 2007 season. He was hired away by Jimbo to F$U the next season to coach TE's and recruit.I don't think it makes much sense to judge Coley based on last season.
It was his first time calling plays. He had major injuries to key offensive personnel. He had an incompetent QB. He had a horrid defense putting his unit in bad situations (often).
Could the offense have been better? Of course. But that doesn't mean Coley isn't going to develop into a stud of an OC (or HC, for that matter). Time will tell.
Given the circumstances, and short time frame, it just isn't fair to judge him (for better or worse) yet.
quick question, who are the Duke's and Coley's talent equivalent on defense? Or at least close to them?
Tracy and Deon.
No doubt Fisch got more out of this offense, and more out of Morris in particular.
But he had more time (here and experience before as well) to accomplish that. Maybe Fisch is just further along at this point in his career as an OC than Coley. Or maybe Fisch just has a way with QBs.
Either way, Fisch had a healthy Morris. Coley did not. I blame Golden (and did so at the time) when it became obvious Morris was severely hampered (beyond his typical mental deficiency) on the field. He should have been pulled.
Coley was saddled with a lame duck QB and his star RB went down hard. Crawford ran tough for a few games and looked like a decent fill-in, but he ran with no authority whatsoever the last few games. Worn down or hiding an injury, but it was obvious he wasn't the same player.
What it boils down to, for me, is that Coley deserves more time (based on his recruiting prowess alone). The fact that Fisch had more success than him 2 seasons ago, in totally different circumstances, does not mean that Coley can't develop into a big asset for this program.