D
deleted3746
Guest
it has nothing to do with being obsessed it has to do with common sense. if a defense is gonna stack the line, then you're not gonna really have a hole to run through. so it makes sense to have a heavier and stronger back to push the pile. it's the same reason you don't drew brees in many short yardage qb sneaks. you don't even need a talented back, just someone who can gain a yard.yearby has loads of potential but i would not have him running dives on short yardage situations. just doesn't make sense schematically and sounds like something our inept staff would do.hey pete. what about joseph yearby's stature or running style makes you think he's a good short yardage back? you don't want a guy who dances around or who weighs 185lbs. i think walter tucker would be a better option because he runs hard and has the power to pick up the short yards needed.
Because Yearby runs hard. He's decisive in his cuts and hits the hole with authority.
Edwards is soft and timid when he's running the ball. A back that big should be looking for contact and delivering punishment.
To add on it is not all about being a big back, I do not know where some became obsessed with big backs. You give the guy who can produce (yearby) the ball.
If Edwards was capable of being that guy, I'd rather have him getting those carries. Edwards isn't the kind of back that can be counted on to do that as of right now.
Let's see what Yearby can do. I'd be willing to bet Tucker might even be a better option than Edwards.