so Pete is "posting" and not reporting? He reads reads threads, talks to friends and watches videos/interviews.Maybe Pete is just relaying info from the numerous sources who have allowed him to beat Matt Porter and the rest on every single recruiting story this year. Maybe.
Porter was talking about Pete's practice report fwiw NOT some recruiting story. Pete does a great job, but Porter had a valid point. Reporting about what you see at practice, without watching practice is silly. He should have been more clear about his information being of the second hand type.
Pete never said he was at practice. It's pretty common knowledge he wasn't. If he was, you'd see a lot more quality content than what the credentialed media has been putting out.
I don't understand what's up with the Ariz haters. He does his thing, Matt does his, caneinsider does theirs. Leave Pete alone and worry about your own work. I like that for the most part Pete has let his Work do the talking.
I don't understand what's up with the Ariz haters. He does his thing, Matt does his, caneinsider does theirs. Leave Pete alone and worry about your own work. I like that for the most part Pete has let his Work do the talking.
Lotta losers on this board. See the guy with the Teddy Bear avatar. He thinks cancer is hilarious.
so Pete is "posting" and not reporting? He reads reads threads, talks to friends and watches videos/interviews.Maybe Pete is just relaying info from the numerous sources who have allowed him to beat Matt Porter and the rest on every single recruiting story this year. Maybe.
Porter was talking about Pete's practice report fwiw NOT some recruiting story. Pete does a great job, but Porter had a valid point. Reporting about what you see at practice, without watching practice is silly. He should have been more clear about his information being of the second hand type.
Pete never said he was at practice. It's pretty common knowledge he wasn't. If he was, you'd see a lot more quality content than what the credentialed media has been putting out.
so Pete is "posting" and not reporting? He reads reads threads, talks to friends and watches videos/interviews.Maybe Pete is just relaying info from the numerous sources who have allowed him to beat Matt Porter and the rest on every single recruiting story this year. Maybe.
Porter was talking about Pete's practice report fwiw NOT some recruiting story. Pete does a great job, but Porter had a valid point. Reporting about what you see at practice, without watching practice is silly. He should have been more clear about his information being of the second hand type.
Pete never said he was at practice. It's pretty common knowledge he wasn't. If he was, you'd see a lot more quality content than what the credentialed media has been putting out.
How was it common knowledge?
Pete never claims info as his own. I would be one of the first in line to say otherwise if it were true. Matt Porter is a complete **** and acting like a **** on Twitter is flat out the most pussified thing a man can do with himself.
So if he doesn't claim that the info is his own shouldn't he credit his source? Not that I care either way just trying to see both sides. And yes porter is. Douche.
LOL thisY'all should be glad it's Pete's source giving his opinion on the team and not Pete out there at practice. Can't trust Pete's evaluations when he thinks JR Smith is an elite Bball player.
I don't understand what's up with the Ariz haters. He does his thing, Matt does his, caneinsider does theirs. Leave Pete alone and worry about your own work. I like that for the most part Pete has let his Work do the talking.
Lotta losers on this board. See the guy with the Teddy Bear avatar. He thinks cancer is hilarious.
Pete never claims info as his own. I would be one of the first in line to say otherwise if it were true. Matt Porter is a complete **** and acting like a **** on Twitter is flat out the most pussified thing a man can do with himself.
So if he doesn't claim that the info is his own shouldn't he credit his source? Not that I care either way just trying to see both sides. And yes porter is. Douche.
As far as I know, most sources don´t want (or can have) their names in public...
Pete never claims info as his own. I would be one of the first in line to say otherwise if it were true. Matt Porter is a complete **** and acting like a **** on Twitter is flat out the most pussified thing a man can do with himself.
So if he doesn't claim that the info is his own shouldn't he credit his source? Not that I care either way just trying to see both sides. And yes porter is. Douche.
As far as I know, most sources don´t want (or can have) their names in public...
That's fine.. Then mention the sources as being anonymous. Either way, if a reporter is not getting the information firsthand he should make mention of it.
Pete never claims info as his own. I would be one of the first in line to say otherwise if it were true. Matt Porter is a complete **** and acting like a **** on Twitter is flat out the most pussified thing a man can do with himself.
So if he doesn't claim that the info is his own shouldn't he credit his source? Not that I care either way just trying to see both sides. And yes porter is. Douche.
As far as I know, most sources don´t want (or can have) their names in public...
That's fine.. Then mention the sources as being anonymous. Either way, if a reporter is not getting the information firsthand he should make mention of it.
The issue is if hes is getting info from other publications. Those places should absolutely be mentioned as sources
I didn't know that there were so many journalism teachers on our board critiquing if Peter cited his sources correctly or not.
I didn't know that there were so many journalism teachers on our board critiquing if Peter cited his sources correctly or not.