Good to have you back Pete. I have come to terms with TV's sale to LSU. The upside is his loss kills Al's 3-4. No NT for Al. Class has fine DTs for a 4-3 though and great DEs for one. I am hoping Al has no choice for to change. I like getting Treon now. Clearly FSU used him so maybe him and Ice will be more reasonable if he doesn't make it at QB. Between this and the whole "we own your rear" last year with the LB, BTW should have a clear vision of what the criminoles are like.
Courtel Jenkins is a NT all day and twice on sunday. Not to mention there are several under the radar types out there.
Remember AG when he was a 3* Temple developed NT Terrance "Pot Roast Knighton who plays for the Denver Broncos.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrance_Knighton
Go Canes
IMHO people are sleeping on Jenkins. Ideally we would be able to redshirt him, but I think he can come in and help right away. TV would have been more likely to have an immediate impact, but Jenkins is a very good NT prospect in his own right.
I love Jenkins. I don't see him being ready to do anything at that position as a true freshman other than get physically abused. It would be criminal to expect him to come in here and give us much in light of what we ask our DTs to do.
Not sure why people are bashing our recruiting class when it's in the top 10 in the country. Should it be in the top 2 coming off a 9 win season, where FSU won the title? Just seems unrealistic to think that anything besides top 3 is an utter disappointment.
It won't be on Wednesday. We are currently at 8, 8, 11, 11 on the big 4 services and the other schools are actually going to close by adding players, not losing them.
Honestly, if we switch to a 4-3 base defense, I think we solve a lot of problems. All of the guys we have at DT, except for maybe Courtel and Wyche. Even our DE's are 4-3 DE's. Yeah, McCord, AQM, DJ can play the jack lb position, but wth is the staff going to do with Chad Thomas? He's clearly not a 3-4 olb, too small and would be stupid to make him into a 3-4 end. Please give the 4-3 a shot staff!!!
The funny thing is contrary to what he thinks or what lsu sold him isn't tv a classic 3 4 guy? Certainly has the potential to make a lot of money in that role in the nfl. How many teams run a 3 4?
Honestly, if we switch to a 4-3 base defense, I think we solve a lot of problems. All of the guys we have at DT, except for maybe Courtel and Wyche. Even our DE's are 4-3 DE's. Yeah, McCord, AQM, DJ can play the jack lb position, but wth is the staff going to do with Chad Thomas? He's clearly not a 3-4 olb, too small and would be stupid to make him into a 3-4 end. Please give the 4-3 a shot staff!!!
The funny thing is contrary to what he thinks or what lsu sold him isn't tv a classic 3 4 guy? Certainly has the potential to make a lot of money in that role in the nfl. How many teams run a 3 4?
Yes and no to the TV question. Yes, in that he is capable of playing in both defenses. He's big enough to play effectively in a 3-4 defense; however, his best attribute as a player is his ability to get upfield. 3-4 defenses are 2 gap systems where you're just supposed to occupy blockers so the LB's flow through and make the plays. The OLB's are the ones getting the pressure on the qb. So, for TV, we want him to penetrate and be disruptive. IMO, for the players that we currently have, the 3-4 makes no sense, even if we still did have TV. In a 4-3, you want your DE's to be around 250-260 lb, right? At least in college, anyway. Not small enough to where they're not stout against the run or can't set the edge against the run, but not big and slow enough to where they can't get to the qb. Weren't AQM and McCord 240 and 235 last season, respectively? Reasonable to say that before next season starts, they'll be between 250-260, right? I think it could work.
As for the other question, are you talking about 3-4 defenses in the NCAA or in the NFL? No idea about college. I can't really see that many because guys generally aren't big enough to run that at this level, but I have no clue. As for the NFL, I think around more than half of the teams run a 3-4 base defense. The number could change because of the coaching turnover, so different coaches bring in different DC's with different philosophies. But for our team, the "strength" of our "defense" is the secondary. Last year, everything defensively was a problem. I just think that it all stems from the deficiencies defending the run. A 4-3 defense would help in negating that deficiency or at least mitigating the issues because we would simply have more guys on the line who are comfortable with that system and actually know what they're doing. Anyway, that's my 2 cents, anyway.
Correct ^^
You can have similar alignments but entirely different philosophies.
i want treon. we need a duel threat guy. that is the trend in college football.
i want treon. we need a duel threat guy. that is the trend in college football.
Treon is not a need.
i want treon. we need a duel threat guy. that is the trend in college football.
Treon is not a need.
i want treon. we need a duel threat guy. that is the trend in college football.
Treon is not a need.
Top talent is always a need.
It Takes Time Fellas, Give Golden time and we shall see every head coach deserves at least 4 years to get his players in there and change the culture around campus which he has & Also wait and see till players come in and buy into the whole situation. Remember Golden inherit a bad football team with far less talent than what we have in campus as of today so let him do his thing and if he doesn't do anything this upcoming season then start doubting the man until then give him a chance... We almost ran out Butch Davis after a horrendous season but we stick to the process and he manage to gather around the more talented football team to ever play in this BCS era and maybe of all times, 01'.
So let's wait and see we still have a few good players coming in and remember recruiting its a whole lot more complicated than back in the days so we won't be able to get them all until we start winning like back in the days...