forums

The Obsession With WRs Has To Stop

We have a #1 WR on the roster.

How many #1 WR's can you have at once? The answer is...one.

We have plenty of #2 /#3 level talent WR's.

The focus should be on other positions. WR is not a problem.
 
Advertisement
Al Foil said:
We have a #1 WR on the roster.

How many #1 WR's can you have at once? The answer is...one.

We have plenty of #2 /#3 level talent WR's.

The focus should be on other positions. WR is not a problem.
Click to expand...

Umm.....No.

We have next to nothing in speed. And you can't stack talent at the receiver position. Our only serviceable receivers going into next year that have proven anything is Richards. Mullins is talented but he couldn't even sniff the field.
 
orange&green84 said:
Al Foil said:
We have a [URL=https://www.canesinsight.com/usertag.php?do=list&action=hash&hash=1]#1 [/URL] WR on the roster.

How many [URL=https://www.canesinsight.com/usertag.php?do=list&action=hash&hash=1]#1 [/URL] WR's can you have at once? The answer is...one.

We have plenty of [URL=https://www.canesinsight.com/usertag.php?do=list&action=hash&hash=2]#2 [/URL] /#3 level talent WR's.

The focus should be on other positions. WR is not a problem.
Click to expand...

Umm.....No.

We have next to nothing in speed. And you can't stack talent at the receiver position. Our only serviceable receivers going into next year that have proven anything is Richards. Mullins is talented but he couldn't even sniff the field.
Click to expand...

Agree, we have a #1 (Richards) and a couple #3s imo (Berrios and Cager). Mullins is a huge question mark and unless Cager comes back 100% and improves, I don't know that we have a #2 on the roster/.
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back
Top