forums

The high and mighty sec

Advertisement
OriginalGatorHater said:
None of those teams played against ACC teams. I am not saying bowl games matter. I don't think they matter. You are the one that keeps pushing the narrative so I wanted to hear your response to the first ACC vs SEC game.
Click to expand...
Again, you don’t get the point. Literally no one has said the ACC is better. We’re just laughing at “6-7 Auburn would win the ACC”.
 
Advertisement
WanderFranco said:
Not me. Maybe only respond that way to the people who write it.
Click to expand...
You are the one that responded to me. So you agree the SEC is the best conference? Auburn would win the ACC because they have more talent than any team besides Clemson. Not because they played Bama close. I also said they might lose to Clemson.
 
OriginalGatorHater said:
You are the one that responded to me. So you agree the SEC is the best conference? Auburn would win the ACC because they have more talent than any team besides Clemson. Not because they played Bama close. I also said they might lose to Clemson.
Click to expand...
Auburn wouldn’t win the ACC. Let’s just stop with that silliness.

And why are you bringing up Clemson? They didn’t win the ACC.
 
Advertisement
WanderFranco said:
Auburn wouldn’t win the ACC. Let’s just stop with that silliness.

And why are you bringing up Clemson? They didn’t win the ACC.
Click to expand...
You are the one that keeps mentioning Clemson. Auburn most likely would, especially if DJ is off in the Auburn Clemson game. However, if this is all you want to discuss. A hypothetical game. Then there is nothing to discuss. I am here to discuss how much better the SEC is than the ACC.
 
OriginalGatorHater said:
So which conf do you think is the best? The B1G?
Click to expand...
I think there is a bias with the sec. When I watched Houston outplay Auburn, I heard the announcers blatantly favor Auburn. If you read the recap, it's the same thing. Espn has been pushing the sec narrative for over 10 years. I remember back in 2013 them saying Jimbo built fsu like an sec team... as if fsu was a nobody during the 90's.

Over the years, I have analyzed teams without a premeditated bias and I have noticed that there is equality in every conference. Some people forget that Georgia State was smoking Auburn earlier this year until Auburn pulled a rabbit out of their ***.

At the end of the day, there are about 5 really good teams every year and then there is everyone else. I don't care who the best conference is, but I will call bs when I see it.
 
CanesDynasty said:
I think there is a bias with the sec. When I watched Houston outplay Auburn, I heard the announcers blatantly favor Auburn. If you read the recap, it's the same thing. Espn has been pushing the sec narrative for over 10 years. I remember back in 2013 them saying Jimbo built fsu like an sec team... as if fsu was a nobody during the 90's.

Over the years, I have analyzed teams without a premeditated bias and I have noticed that there is equality in every conference. Some people forget that Georgia State was smoking Auburn earlier this year until Auburn pulled a rabbit out of their ***.

At the end of the day, there are about 5 really good teams every year and then there is everyone else. I don't care who the best conference is, but I will call bs when I see it.
Click to expand...
I disagree. SUre there are only a few really good teams, but the SEC generally has them. UGA/Bama are better than Ohio state/Michigan, Oregon/Utah, Pitt/Miami, Oklahoma st/Baylor. Then you get to the middle of the pack. Auburn, TAMU, UF, LSU. Generally are better than the FSU, Pitt, UNC. Wash, USC, WSU, Stanford. Oklahoma St, Iowa st. The only close one is the B1g with MSU, PSU, Whisky, Iowa.

Then you go to the bottom feeders. Vandy, Tenn, USCE Kentuky, arkansas. Who are better than the Cuse, Dukes. The Colorado UCLAs. Kansas TCU. The indys rutgers/etc.
 
OriginalGatorHater said:
I disagree. SUre there are only a few really good teams, but the SEC generally has them. UGA/Bama are better than Ohio state/Michigan, Oregon/Utah, Pitt/Miami, Oklahoma st/Baylor. Then you get to the middle of the pack. Auburn, TAMU, UF, LSU. Generally are better than the FSU, Pitt, UNC. Wash, USC, WSU, Stanford. Oklahoma St, Iowa st. The only close one is the B1g with MSU, PSU, Whisky, Iowa.

Then you go to the bottom feeders. Vandy, Tenn, USCE Kentuky, arkansas. Who are better than the Cuse, Dukes. The Colorado UCLAs. Kansas TCU. The indys rutgers/etc.
Click to expand...
Hey man have some respect. That’s an sec bowl winning team right there
 
Advertisement
OriginalGatorHater said:
I disagree. SUre there are only a few really good teams, but the SEC generally has them. UGA/Bama are better than Ohio state/Michigan, Oregon/Utah, Pitt/Miami, Oklahoma st/Baylor. Then you get to the middle of the pack. Auburn, TAMU, UF, LSU. Generally are better than the FSU, Pitt, UNC. Wash, USC, WSU, Stanford. Oklahoma St, Iowa st. The only close one is the B1g with MSU, PSU, Whisky, Iowa.

Then you go to the bottom feeders. Vandy, Tenn, USCE Kentuky, arkansas. Who are better than the Cuse, Dukes. The Colorado UCLAs. Kansas TCU. The indys rutgers/etc.
Click to expand...

I guess Clemson doesn’t count anywhere.
 
OriginalGatorHater said:
I didn't list everyone in every conference. Generally Clemson would take Pitts spot and pitt would drop down a section. Nothing changes. UGA/Bama is still better than Miami/Clemson.
Click to expand...

It’s just intellectually dishonest to compare the ACC with another conference and leave out a national champion that has won 10 games for 11 straight seasons. And then just kind of shrug and say they are the same as Pitt.
 
Advertisement
Wow. This is amazing.

Lets do this. Lets transplant the ACC coastal into the SEC East. Guess what happens. Georgia dominates and wins the division and everyone else is left to beat up on each other. 5-6, 6-6, 9-3, 7-4. Whatever. And these teams have some massive cache because why?

3 little letters....... S E C . Oh but they are good because they have to play each other. (y)
 
WanderFranco said:
It’s just intellectually dishonest to compare the ACC with another conference and leave out a national champion that has won 10 games for 11 straight seasons. And then just kind of shrug and say they are the same as Pitt.
Click to expand...
You are the one who keeps mentioning how Clemson isn't even the champion. I said numerous times I think Clemson is the best team in the conf. Because Miami is the second most talented team in the conf and we beat the ACCC. Either way we can let you choose whoever you want to be the top teams. Put Clemson and Pitt in there. They are clearly on a level below Bama and UGA.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top