You’re a high school coach, right? So you deal with young people each and every day. Good for you we need good leaders.
I’m glad you have inside information that reveals to you what training methods and what specific sprints were run in a recent practice.
I still don’t understand the correlation to injuries which you claim, (I think you said something like 1/3 of the players at Oregon, and Miami) caused by these training methods or other inappropriate training methods.
I’m certainly no expert on training methods, my background was a BS chemistry in college, grad school was business, so irrelevant, but I just wanted to throw it in there. But I know a little bit about science and having a burden of scientific proof.
That’s where I’m coming from but I guess I’m some jabrone that wants just a little evidence when someone makes medical claims.
I still teach but I no longer coach HS FB. I coach at a private training facility with all sports, all ages
It's not good for me, it's good for society. Good for me would be a private island with Hawaiian Tropic models needing a lotion boy.
No one is going to be able to walk in and say A-HA here's the evidence, this isn't Law & Order.
I was in football for 10 years as a chitty player, 20 as a never-was coach, and in S&C 20 years as well.
I'm a certified S&C coach that's in the field practicing coaching 3-4x a week.
Reading material:
Conditioning Article
Cramping
Running poles is dumb
Reverse engineering
Four coactives
Rhea + Ballou = Ring
If you never run at max velocity: 1- you'll never get faster, 2- you're more prone to injury when you do run at max velo in a game
If I run that volume above prescribed without training for it, I'm greatly increasing my risk of injury during the condo work
If I run that volume prescribed and train for it, I'm greatly increasing my risk of injury in football specific periods
Their workout detrained the athlete for their sport, and for speed
Now you have to focus on the movement efficiency that breaks down when you start to add volume and distance
Move less efficient, get tired faster.
Run 100's at all tired, get injured. Run 100's 200's and 300's... good luck!
100m is a long distance for anyone, it's 3 races in one. But it's especially long for anyone that isn't a small skill.
Throwers might bust out a 60m sprint here or there, but they work up to it.
There are 100m sprinters who never run 100m. There are 400m 'sprinters' who never run the 400.
So why are football players, who hardly run 50 yards a pop, running 300's? 200's? 100's?
The answer isn't "toughness" that's task-specific. If X team runs 300's to be tough, and then they are bottom 20 in penalties, are they tough?
The answer isn't conditioning, it's not to 'prevent cramps', it's not making you faster, stronger, more powerful, or cutting quicker
You won't block, tackle, pursue, intercept, throw, catch or run better because of them
So why do it?