Texas vs Georgia

[PRcane787]

I was told “Sark Sarking again”

Nothing a couple sips at half could not fix!

 

[Cajuncane]

Lot of guns in that parking lot this evening.

**** I’ll bet there’s a bunch in that stadium

 

[Calinative]

Put it like this, if the conferences added a Ref in the booth to assist the refs on the field in real time so that they don't have egregious misses, do you think that is better for the sport or worse? I think it's better.

There was no DPI on that play, period.

 

[Stingarov]

Put it like this, if the conferences added a Ref in the booth to assist the refs on the field in real time so that they don't have egregious misses, do you think that is better for the sport or worse? I think it's better.

There was no DPI on that play, period.

if anything was OPI

 

[ddann]

Blueprint for getting a call you don’t like overturned. Precedent set.

 

[johnnytsunami01]

Lol, you have clearly never watched a football game before. It happens a lot.

I think you are confusing the classic "there was no penalty for..." where they pick up a flag, but they don't actually state a penalty and then minutes later say there was no penalty. Usually they throw a flag, discuss, and it is common for them to pick it up and say there was no penalty. I don't recall many if any where they announce it then a few moments later reverse the call

 

[JamesQuall]

When have you ever seen a penalty get announced and then overturned

Never. Ever. I've watched a lot of CFB too

 

[TemplarCane]

The PI call was questionable.

But changing the call after the bottle throwing was MUCH MORE questionable.

Oh, definitely a bad look.

But the referees started discussing the call before the fans showed their displeasure.

There was no PI, referees discussed, and got the call right.

We can criticize the refs when they get a call blatantly wrong, but let’s not criticize them when they change their mind to get a call right.

 

[NC_Canes_11]

Student sections are gonna do that **** hoping to get a bad call changed. What a horrible precedent that just set.

 

[NC_Canes_11]

Put it like this, if the conferences added a Ref in the booth to assist the refs on the field in real time so that they don't have egregious misses, do you think that is better for the sport or worse? I think it's better.

There was no DPI on that play, period.

I agree. The NFL model of this has worked this year

 

[Calinative]

I can't believe

I've seen them overturn penalties, very rare, but it happens......5 minutes after the play occurred? Nope, never.

How do you know they didn't want to start the discussion right away but they had to deal with all the bottles being thrown?

 

[flips]

Put it like this, if the conferences added a Ref in the booth to assist the refs on the field in real time so that they don't have egregious misses, do you think that is better for the sport or worse? I think it's better.

There was no DPI on that play, period.

They should be able to review and pick up obviously dog **** flags like this one was. What they shouldn't ever do is be able to add a flag on a play that they missed in real time

 

[Calinative]

if anything was OPI

We literally got called for less today lol

 

[ddann]

Oh, definitely a bad look.

But the referees started discussing the call before the fans showing were their displeasure.

There was no PI, referees discussed, and got the call right.

We can criticize the refs when they get a call blatantly wrong, but let’s not criticize them when they change their mind to get a call right.

Video proof?

They had their discussion. It was over.

Fans threw bottles.

They had ANOTHER discussion.

Result? Call changed.

 

[Calinative]

I think you are confusing the classic "there was no penalty for..." where they pick up a flag, but they don't actually state a penalty and then minutes later say there was no penalty. Usually they throw a flag, discuss, and it is common for them to pick it up and say there was no penalty. I don't recall many if any where they announce it then a few moments later reverse the call

It happens.

 

[Mr. Dynasty1]

I think you are confusing the classic "there was no penalty for..." where they pick up a flag, but they don't actually state a penalty and then minutes later say there was no penalty. Usually they throw a flag, discuss, and it is common for them to pick it up and say there was no penalty. I don't recall many if any where they announce it then a few moments later reverse the call

He knows the difference but he’s in too deep know so he’s goin to pretend that a foul being announced and then overturned 2 mins later happens.

 

[JHallCanes]

Nothing a couple sips at half could not fix!

To be fair I wouldn’t blame him in this one

 

[Virginia_Cane]

Kirby’s a prick

 

[pyhooya]

For all of you talking about changing the call after all that time. Remind again how the end of Miami lateral against Duke ended

 

[Mr. Dynasty1]

Oh, definitely a bad look.

But the referees started discussing the call before the fans showed their displeasure.

There was no PI, referees discussed, and got the call right.

We can criticize the refs when they get a call blatantly wrong, but let’s not criticize them when they change their mind to get a call right.

They didn’t throw the flag and then have a discussion.

They threw the flag, announced the penalty, marked the yardage and then reversed the call after the bottles were thrown.