Yes, it is Morris. Because Duke was open on may plays where Morris looked right past him and forced a throw to a receiver deeper downfield. While the RB may not have been the featured receiver as often under Coley, he was there as a checkdown, and was often wide open, and was typically ignored by Morris in favor of a more difficult throw. I still recall a drive in one game that stalled on a third down as Duke was wide open 3-4 yards downfield with no defender within at least 3-5 yards of him, and only medium yardage needed for the first down. Morris rolled out under pressure, ignored Duke completely, threw right past him to a well-covered Lewis along the sideline, and couldn't complete it...so we punted...three and out...again. THat one stuck out in my mind because I recall screaming at the TV I was so ****ed. But it happened over and over and over again all season.
You guys keep saying Morris didn't know how to use his checkdown, but somehow magically he did it just fine with Fisch. Noone here is saying that Morris was a superstar. In my defense of Morris, I'm not trying to say he was going to be a 1st round qb under Fisch. My point is that Fisch understood where Morris's strengths and weaknesses were and he tried to coach around them. Not a **** one of you couch potatoes know what the progressions were, but seem to know so much about Morris's progressions and somehow under Fisch, our RB's had over 60 receptions with Morris at qb vs 24 under Coley.
Example - Let's say Fisch understood that Morris is good for 1-2 reads at best. In this case, Fisch makes that rb the 1st or 2nd read in the play. Coley on the other hand says hmm, Morris doesn't know how to make a read, but he's got a big arm. Let me make WR1, WR2, and WR3 run deep routes and have them be the first 3 reads and this will negate the inability to make a read. Problem is under Coley, all 3 are deep, and in the same place where the defense is expecting the ball to go.
For all we know, Morris's check downs may have been the 3rd, 4th or 5th read. If Morris cannot make progressions as many of you believe, then Coley needs to adjust his playcalling to put his player in a position to succeed.
Then we have people talking about yards per play. Knowing the numbers and actually watching the game tell 2 different stories. Under Fisch, Morris did not have Stacy Coley. How many huge plays did Coley break for us last year. That kind of thing will boost the numbers. Under Coley, our offense is throwing bombs more often it appears, because that seems to be all Morris would throw (see above about progressions) and if its a completion its a big boost to the avg, but if he misses, it doesn't count against it. Under Fisch though, it appeared more reads were focused on shorter passes and the bombs were a good change of pace. shorter throws = less avg yards.
Here is some numbers for you stat guys.
Passing completions of 10+ yards:
Coley: 116
Fisch: 131
Passing plays of 20+ yards:
Coley: 57
Fisch: 52
Passing plays of 30+ yards:
Coley: 36
Fisch: 25
Anyone see the trend here? Trending up seems to be the favorite here. In 77 less passing attempts (47 less completions), Coley has far higher % of plays going deep than Fisch does. This is going to lead to an obvious higher avg. This is
also a possible indication that his progressions given to him by his coaches playcalling were more focused on deep routes. If you have a qb who is not great at his progressions, then you don't make the **** checkdown 4th or 5th in the progression.