Some names to watch before it’s deleted

Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement
Not sold on weather or living in Miami vs Toledo being much of a factor here.

Guy has to be doing this only as a stepping stone to a P5 head coaching job that will likely be in a town a lot like Toledo.

Don’t even think the mill more is much of a motivation. The most expensive home currently on Realtor.com in Toledo costs $850k. See what that gets you in the Gables or S. Miami.

Dude’s here gambling on a hit it and quit it.
Ohio…. State taxes right?

Yeah he’s gonna be making more noticeably here
 
Advertisement
1642535726687.gif
 
Maybe this forces Candle to make a decision, whether it’s true Briles was offered or not
 
Advertisement
Ferman taking advanced level courses at the Andrew Ivins School of Journalism.
For the record, I don't pay for that crap. Actually got the login from a Cane grad I interviewed with like a decade ago. Occasionally pop in to see what's up. Usually the same. I think Gary has run out of sources. He's constantly hedging, flip-flopping, and pulling the Navarro "I've heard this, too."
 
Advertisement
The point was pre-snap motion isn’t the sole barometer by which to judge an offense, just because an OC uses lots of pre-snap motion doesn’t mean the offense is more effective than one that doesn’t.

We used a lot of pre-snap with Enox & could barely move the ball when it mattered, we didn’t use any pre-snap with Lashlee & had the best offense we’ve had here in decades.

not a wedge issue to determine how good or bad an OC is.

1.) At the NFL level, teams that use pre-snap motion, shifts, & play-action end up winning 65% of the time. That's almost as big of an advantage as having a positive turnover differential.

"What’s less well-known is the size of the edge that play-action and pre-snap motion provides. It turns out it’s also considerable: Since 2017, if all you know after a game ends is each team’s share of offensive plays that featured play-action and the share of plays that had some form of pre-snap motion, you can correctly guess the winner around 65 percent of the time This is fairly impressive, since neither metric directly measures the volume of yards gained or points scored. Instead, these are play design choices made before the ball is snapped and the play’s outcome is determined."

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-49ers-believe-in-the-magic-of-pre-snap-motion/

2.) Enos's tenure @ MIA was unsuccessful for a variety of reasons. Not the least of which was the personnel he had to deal with. Go back and take a look at the roster on that 2019 team. Not even your boy Lincoln Riley could've done anything with that. Do you think Enos would've been more successful if he actually got a chance to coach the QB he recruited to MIA, TVD, instead of Jarren Williams who at the time was a weed head, and notoriously lazy? 🤷‍♂️

3.) Actually, the best Offense this program has had in the last few decades was under Whipple, who unsurprisingly ran a lot of pre-snap motion & shifts. He accomplished that with worse personnel than what Lashlee had the last 2 yrs. In fact even Fisch was able to field a better Offense than Lashlee.

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ncaa/fei/overalloff/2009

Ultimately, pre-snap motion & shifts are just tools that an OC has at its disposal. Whether or not it's effective depends on the personnel he has access to. For the Packers, Chiefs, 49ers, Patriots, & Pitt in college they were wedge issues.
 
Advertisement
I imagine we'll get clarity today at list which one he wants with all this smoke
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement
Back
Top