forums

SIAP JESS SIMPSON EXPECTED TO BE MIAMI'S NEW DL COACH

Advertisement
simplycanes said:
Agree a lot here. Outcoaching and outscheming are different things. The former is all the things you list. I haven't seen Alabama outscheme anyone ever. I see them outcoach and overwhelm with talent all the time.
Click to expand...

Gotta disagree here. I see teams get out-schemed all the time in college. How else do yall explain all these efficient/high scoring spread offenses? Teams like Ole Miss give Alabama fits and it ain't cause of talent. It's scheme.

Scheme won/lost the National Championship game. That last play...the game winner...that was a difference in scheme not talent.

You can't say scheme matters on the NFL level but not the college level when EVERYTHING THE NFL DOES IS TAKEN FROM COLLEGE. Turn on any NFL game and you'll see a bunch of college concepts.

We got out-schemed a ton last season. How else do yall explain our defense allowing multiple QB's to have career days?
You would think we weren't out-schemed if you didn't know what you were looking at. I could easily make an argument that we were indeed out-schemed.
*Narduzzi knew Rosier couldn't make accurate throws against tight coverage so he put 8/9 in the box to stop the run and played his version of Quarters/Man coverage, forcing Malik to make accurate throws.
*Clemson definitely out-schemed us and out-talented us. How else do you explain the score being that lopsided so quick?
*Wisconsin made a legit effort to execute back-shoulder throws against our man coverage cause they knew our DB's wouldn't/couldn't turn around and play the ball. How else do you explain their QB having a career day? They out-talented us? Nah.
 
Advertisement
Coach Macho said:
And that's why they're leaving in droves.

I just wonder when the state is gonna wake up.
Click to expand...

Uhhhh...never.

FHSAA let’s kids pinball from school to school encouraging and fostering diva behavior at an early age. They don’t really care and nobody really benefits from this except a few.

I know they have nothing to do with teacher/coaches salaries per se, but it’s all part of the same entrenched bureaucratic mindset. Plenty of blame to go around. Parents, politicians, legislators, the teachers themselves, the whole system. Last I’ll say on it. This isn’t the forum.
 
Coach Macho said:
Not ****ed up at all.

Coaches work a lot harder than teachers and often have better rapports with the kids.

Teachers go home at 3pm.
Coaches are on campus from 7am to 7pm+. Friday nights we're on campus from 7am to 11pm+. Saturdays we're back on campus at 8am. Then we neglect our families all weekend while trying to prep for next week's opponent.
The byproduct of all this hard work is winning. Winning = more money for the school.

Teachers get slightly less than what they deserve.
Click to expand...

Not slanted view at all. right? If you are talking about colleges, then the professors make very good money today and are overpaid for the crap they put out. High School is very different. Yes, coaches work longer hours but many teachers put in lots of extra time also. More important difference is the fact that coaches are working with a very narrow base of students and the survival of our civilization is hardly dependent on a few athletes. The broad student body in high school however, is in fact the future of the nation. Teaching is a vastly more important job than any game. That said, I love my Cane football so no amount of money is too much for people who help it along.
 
Advertisement
Coach Macho said:
I mean, we know he was a very well established high school coach. And an NFL thought enough of him to seek him out. I could definitely see how this hire could pan out well.

People don't like the hire because it's not a well-known name, but there's plenty of great coaches that are unfamiliar names with fans. I just wish we knew more about his ability to develop DL and recruit. Guess we'll find out.
Click to expand...

99% of this bored had no clue who Kul was, in fact I distinctly recall people arguing he couldn't be all that because he spent so much time at Missouri. Now, we act like anyone on this board could name more than 5 elite DL coaches at any level of football. DL is where you make a smart hire, not a splash hire. Let's see how this guy pans out.
 
Advertisement
Coach Macho said:
Gotta disagree here. I see teams get out-schemed all the time in college. How else do yall explain all these efficient/high scoring spread offenses? Teams like Ole Miss give Alabama fits and it ain't cause of talent. It's scheme.

Scheme won/lost the National Championship game. That last play...the game winner...that was a difference in scheme not talent.

You can't say scheme matters on the NFL level but not the college level when EVERYTHING THE NFL DOES IS TAKEN FROM COLLEGE. Turn on any NFL game and you'll see a bunch of college concepts.

We got out-schemed a ton last season. How else do yall explain our defense allowing multiple QB's to have career days?
You would think we weren't out-schemed if you didn't know what you were looking at. I could easily make an argument that we were indeed out-schemed.
*Narduzzi knew Rosier couldn't make accurate throws against tight coverage so he put 8/9 in the box to stop the run and played his version of Quarters/Man coverage, forcing Malik to make accurate throws.
*Clemson definitely out-schemed us and out-talented us. How else do you explain the score being that lopsided so quick?
*Wisconsin made a legit effort to execute back-shoulder throws against our man coverage cause they knew our DB's wouldn't/couldn't turn around and play the ball. How else do you explain their QB having a career day? They out-talented us? Nah.
Click to expand...

The magical Hawaiian looked off a safety and the UGA kid blew it. There was nothing schematic or revolutionary about that play. That rep was lost on the practice field not the football science department.
 
I dont know enough about the guy to form an intelligent opinion, i just think Manny needs some help, and i'm trusting Richt here, Manny all to many times gets worked in the second half. It was way to easy for teams to convert 3rd and long, no telling how many times we had them waaay behind the chains and gave up the 1st, that will take the spirit right out of a defense.
 
Advertisement
simplycanes said:
The magical Hawaiian looked off a safety and the UGA kid blew it. There was nothing schematic or revolutionary about that play. That rep was lost on the practice field not the football science department.
Click to expand...


Correct me if I’m wrong, didn’t the corner just get flat out beat, caught flat footed, maybe just for a tiny nanosecond peeking into the backfield, so the wr got enough of a jump to get by him, and then the safety just didn’t get over in time. It looked like an ordinary everyday assignment breakdown to me on a simple go, nothing that schematically complex. Just an ordinary defensive breakdown. Corner gets beat, safety doesn’t back him up.
 
The safety got caught looking to the middle of the field. When u look at it, the other safety was nearby also near the middle. It looks to me like it was the safety’s fault if he had deep coverage.
 
SayWhat said:
Man, no disrespect to the guy who could be great, but this is big time questionable hire. I hope it works out for him for obvious reasons. If this was the hire at FSU, UF etc this thread would have a very different tune to it.
Click to expand...

UF and FSU seem to care about splash hires, so who cares what they think. That's a dumb way to go about hiring. FSU and UF probably laughed at who Clemson hired at DL, seems like its working out.

From everything I've seen on Simpson, people who actually know him rave about him. There's almost no doubt he'll be a good recruiter and people think he knows how to coach DL pretty **** well.

Every hire can be considered questionable, that's the nature of the business. But there's good reason to be excited about Simpson. FSU was 7-6 last year and UF was 4-7, I'm not sure they should be commenting on who is a good hire or not
 
Advertisement
Back
Top