- Joined
- Sep 4, 2012
- Messages
- 43,263
Um, not to defend Randy Shannon or strip away any culpability he may have had in all this, but didn't he actually tell everyone to stay away from that slimeball? Again, perhaps that's not enough, but it's not as if he advocated for the guy, either
This is the problem, if Shannon knew about Shapiro's activities and did not advise Hocutt, he will be deemed complicit by the NCAA. If Shannon did advise Hocutt, which many believe he did, and Hocutt did nothing, this is a big problem. Either way UM lacked institutional control. Hocutt had an obligation to thoroughly investigate Shapiro and his activities with the players and it doesn't appear he did. It looks like he chose not to investigate Shapiro cause he didn't want to offend a booster who was giving money to UM. IMO this will be where the NCAA finds cause to hammer us.
IMO, I don't think Shannon knew much about his team. If Shannon didn't know, he couldn't report up because he didn't have anything to report up (he didn't know).
Hocutt and Shalala didn't hear anything from Shannon, because he didn't know and nothing was reported up. Also, Nevin took almost a billion dollars from investors and was able to out do the FBI/DOJ/SEC for some time (relevant because many were duped by this conman criminal aka the smoking gun).
Honestly, what could have been known was likely only known by the end user (the kid who took benefits from Shapiro or the coach that did the same)...this is my hope that because only the end user took stuff and no one else had knowledge that the NCAA punishes the end users here. Some end users have been punished (the kids serving suspensions in the 2011 season and paying back benefits conferred), more end users will be punished (like Bruce Pearl) because raping the program doesn't punish the wrongdoers. Remember now (to the board) we served 2 bowl bans, almost all the players are gone (minus Dyron Dye) and there are no coaches left who were mentioned in the original report...in fact Hocutt is gone.
IMO, we will get a punishment but as the Franchise says the NCAA will hit the coaches harder who were involved.
Excellent post. Hill didn't suddenly decide he didn't like corching at ufag. There are former corches spending huge sums of their own money on legal rep, and they are not doing that for no reason.
Shanntard had a hunch that ****zero was a creep. He didn't like the guy, but I highly doubt it was because he knew anything specific. Most likely, he didn't like him because he was a jock sniffer and knew in his gut that those sorts always want something at the end of the day.
If Shanntard knew any specific misdeeds, then he most likely wouldn't be corching at TCU, as I'm pretty sure TCU made sure he was hireable when they brought him in.