yeah, plenty of land there, but same drive as hard rock. what's the advantage?
look, inter miami spent a long time and money trying to find a good place to build a stadium (a third of the size of hard rock) in the middle of the city. and the best they came up with was melreese park. there are very few good options, only bad options and all of the bad options are not reasonable or feasible regardless of the amount of money.
The advantages to the mall would be that it would at least be our stadium and we could get more money from it.
If you make the roof retractable then it would be the premiere location for concerts and events in all south Florida.
Having a mall like that next to your stadium would mean you would have a booked schedule the first year you open it.
BBT has sawgrass and it’s kind of boring. And small
AAA has bayside and the surrounding areas but it’s small.
The rock is great but if it rains good luck getting a crowd for a concert.
A recruit can come visit for a game and spent the whole day there with his family.
No team in America will have anything close to it.
But making a college stadium with a retractable roof for events is gonna be costly. So why not just keep the rock.
This stadium talk goes in every year.
The question should start and end with hard rock.
I think people have been jaded about it cause of the performance on the field and the desire to recreate the OB.
But for the few weeks we were ranked that place was electric and the stadium is bad ***.
Unless you can make something close to that and make it without the ridiculous red tape that would come and the politics that are gonna happen then just keep the rock.
I think after this season starts that talk of a stadium will die down a lot.