Anyone who has watched football at the high school and college level for any length of time should know that ANY OTHER QB on our roster, including walk-on's could play the position better. There's more to the position than how you make some of the throws.
The notion that he played because "he gave us the best chance to win" is silly groupthink that denies reality. Many of us who have followed football for a time are aware of practice studs who are worthless on game day and we know of guys who rise to the occasion when it counts for real.
and it's hyperbole of this highest order to say that Gray Crow and the true freshman would have been better.
Okay, so I'm with hyperbole and you are with presumptive and we're talking over a cold drink. Tell me how you KNOW the others could not have played "better?" Is Morris any kind of a special standard for QB play?
Other than the big arm and the occasional long ball what is it that you saw in Morris' QB play that was so superior to anyone else on our roster? With our receivers would the long ball have been out of the question for the other roster QB's? Have the other QB's never been competent prior to attending the U?
Is it impossible our next true freshman be better than Morris was?
Not trying to be contentious here, just curious as to your reasoning. It's worth discussing, I think. Anyone else want to jump in on this?