With him reads a lot differently than because of him. He won't kill your team if you're already loaded, but we are not so we need that playmaker.V
Somebody will win a lot of games with him at qb.
With him reads a lot differently than because of him. He won't kill your team if you're already loaded, but we are not so we need that playmaker.V
Somebody will win a lot of games with him at qb.
I think he’s more than a game manager like some are insinuating. The amount of hits and sacks he’s taken there was unbelievable. Just like Cam at Wash St but much worse. Put him in a stable situation I think somebody will get a steal. Indiana would be a great fit.With him reads a lot differently than because of him. He won't kill your team if you're already loaded, but we are not so we need that playmaker.
If you pay that man that amount of $ then we have the dumbest staff on the face of the earth and deserve everything they have coming to them.In a vacuum I’d take him over Emory. But if what D$ and Peter were saying on today’s pod was true, that he’ll be getting $1mm+, that’s a horrible move.
Hearing rumblings about an up and comer named Bom Trady that has a weird desire to upstage Bill Belichick.You butterflies have to start thinking bigger!! Why are we only looking in the portal??! Remember we got Cam from the DRAFT!! Mario might be looking at who already declared for the NFL ! lol
Gotcha. Another poster clarified that. Thanksyou are missing the fact that Ewers is a junior.
Lose/LoseCurious to hear folks' opinion on this hypothetical:
Do we say no to Mendoza and take the risk that if Ewers shows out in the playoff that he renegs on us and goes into the draft?
- Mateer doesn't choose Miami
- Miami has a wink and a nod agreement with Ewers to come here after Texas is done in the playoff
- Mendoza wants to come to Miami and will commit by the end of next week
Only way to win is to get Mateer then, or are there other portal QBs (both in and potentially in) that you like?Lose/Lose
I don't have a preference yet. The roster as constructed today needs a superman QB. If we go out and grab personnel to support a game manager than options would expand for me.Only way to win is to get Mateer then, or are there other portal QBs (both in and potentially in) that you like?
This is where I'm at too. If they wanna go game manager then so be it. But they better have a better plan at DB. A game manager isn't going to be able to dig us out of the holes our current DBs would put us in.I don't have a preference yet. The roster as constructed today needs a superman QB. If we go out and grab personnel to support a game manager than options would expand for me.
My board has materialized into the below (the gkkd ones havent entered....yet).Only way to win is to get Mateer then, or are there other portal QBs (both in and potentially in) that you like?
But but oh never mind
We’re not going after the QB that two bottom barrel big 10 teams and a one year wonder with the softest schedule in the P4 are, which clearly means anyone who thinks Mendoza isn’t the second coming of Christ is a moron.But what?
Thanks. Mine is similar.My board has materialized into the below (the gkkd ones havent entered....yet).
1. Mateer
2. Sawyer Robertson
3. Ewers
4. Jackson Arnold
5. Miller Moss
6. Mendoza
He was already a P4 starter, was anyone expecting him to drop to G5?We’re not going after the QB that two bottom barrel big 10 teams and a one year wonder with the softest schedule in the P4 are, which clearly means anyone who thinks Mendoza isn’t the second coming of Christ is a moron.
And one of those stole TVD from us ................................We’re not going after the QB that two bottom barrel big 10 teams and a one year wonder with the softest schedule in the P4 are, which clearly means anyone who thinks Mendoza isn’t the second coming of Christ is a moron.