That Virginia team was far from one of their worst teams. They went through some early turmoil, then obviously put it all together just like they did the year before.
Or they obviously got super lucky. See, this is where your dishonesty comes into full view.
You claim that the 2015 and 2016 Miami teams were lucky (when they really weren't) but then turn around and attribute "putting it all together" to explain Virginia's success in 2015.
This was their road to Omaha. They were sent to the Lake Elsinore Regional (which is over 160 miles away from the host school). So they played in an effective neutral site Regional.
# 2 Southern California
# 4 San Diego State
# 2 Southern California
They missed the # 1 seed in that Regional.
Then the # 1 seed they were paired with (the # 1 national seed!) lost to 3-seed Maryland. This allowed them to host a Super Regional.
# 3 Maryland
# 3 Maryland
So the team that went 15-15 in the "weak" ACC and was a 3-seed in the NCAA Tournament missed the 1-seed in their Regional and the 1-seed in the Regional paired with them. Then they got to host a Super Regional.
If this was Miami is there any doubt what Jagr's angle would have been?
But since it was Virginia they "put it all together" and won it.