Con que? With what? I got 8 more minutes before my lunch break is over and I have to a head to a meeting, so correct me if you saw something else. I'm trying to get discussion goin', if you can't tell.
I'm sayin...
Good work. Keep it goin. LOL
I thought you meant other games. I was like, man, I dunno if I have enough time for that.
Here are some things that could be viewed as negative, but I'm gonna keep my Ibis hat on (the one Duke wore after he won the State 'ship) and try to look at this stuff optimistically:
- There has to be some reason Coley insists on balanced sets. Is it a tendency shown to be broken when we motion into trips?
- We had a good amount of guys open on underneath crossing routes against WF. I didn't notice it as much when I watched live. Morris' PA off the "zone stretch" is pretty solid and, since they run that play so **** often to the left side (short or wide), I absolutely have to think it's setup for something. I'm gonna be optimistic.
- I don't have an exact #, but there has to be a reason we run the ball like 80%+ of the time Walford goes in motion? I'm gonna be optimistic.
- When we audibled and Duke shortened his distance from the LOS, it was a pass. Would like to see the same tendency and give him (or Hagens) a quick dive.
- Have I missed it or have we simply not shown an unbalanced set? With the success BC had early on w/ this formation and our depth at OL, why hasn't this been shown or done? I'm gonna be optimistic.
- I think it was you or NewYorkCane who noted that we're running verticals with quick outs. What in the **** happened to the flood concept? Morris actually throws that post route (last year, the deep in to Scott) decently well, so where is it? I'm gonna be optimistic.
There are more that I have on the notepad back in my office. The general theme is that I saw Coley break tendency in the second half and it gave me a glimmer of hope that all of the stuff written above will be broken at the right time: this week and next.