- Joined
- Mar 14, 2019
- Messages
- 816
But Vandy losing as a national seed is rock solid proof.
It's rock solid proof that they choked that year, yes.
But Vandy losing as a national seed is rock solid proof.
Luck had nothing to do with the Omaha appearances in 2015 and 2016.
There goes that awful logic again.
No this team is not totally awful, but awful enough not to get very far in any playoffs we might be eligible for.The level of dumb on this board is astonishing.
So 100% turnaround which would presume that this team was totally awful (which it's not)
And...
Win the ACC Tourney (which isn't required)
Neither of those things needs to happen for this team to go to Omaha.
"You're just really awful at logic."
Logic has nothing to do with it. Some times a team has weak regional and super regional opponents. Or the other teams they play go into a slump. The point is we have not played for the championship for several years. Just because we lucked out and made it to Omaha in a couple of instances, does not mean we will repeat it this year or any other year. The only way we get to Omaha this year is for this team to make a 100% turn around, win the ACC tourney, regionals and super regionals. If you think the Canes can do it this year, get on the next plane to Vegas and put your money on the canes to win it all. I'm sure you can get some very good odds on your bet.
Are you on your way to Vegas yet? Put your money where your mouth is, that is if you really believe what you are posting.
No this team is not totally awful, but awful enough not to get very far in any playoffs we might be eligible for.
Winning the ACC tourney is not required, but it gets you hosting privileges in the regionals and possibly the Super Regionals.
The hitting is finally coming together but the pitching completely fell off. This could only happen to us.
How long have you been watching NCAA baseball? Winning your conference tourney goes a long way on where the committee places regionals. The only other thing is how much money is bid by a school to host. UM usually has put in a winning bid.No it doesn't.
It's rock solid proof that they choked that year, yes.
That data has nothing to do with the 2015-16 teams being lucky or not.
As I said, you're bad at this and it's obvious.
How long have you been watching NCAA baseball? Winning your conference tourney goes a long way on where the committee places regionals.
Vandy loses = proof that they choked
Vandy loses = proof that they choked
Miami loses = small sample size, the game is random
It was to prove a point that fielding matters because an idiot made a comment that fielding doesn't matter trying to tell me I don't know what I'm talking about. Italso shows how far the gap really is for a team that is jus 10 points better in fielding than Miami. Fielding errors have cost us 2-3 games already. Two of them in conference (NC State game 3 and Pitt game 2).Am sorry, but who cares? Perez threw away two games in successive years against the Gators, but fielding has yet to adversely impact us.
Why do we need to get to 98% from 96%. Who cares?
UM has the youngest team in the NCAA. Of course there will be more errors.
I would trade the best hitting team in the ACC for the worst fielding team any day. If McKEndry starts pitching like he did last year and Veliz hits his 2017 stride, we are going to Omaha.
What is the fixation with errors?
Yes.
#1 national seed loses at home to mediocre Big Ten team = choked.
Miami never had an equivalent loss to Vandy's in Jim Morris' tenure.
So, you're grasping again.
That is so embarrassingly typical.
Miami loses? Baseball is random, any team can lose, small sample size.
Vandy loses? Yep, they choked.