FreePawn
Last Fvcken Week.
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2012
- Messages
- 2,218
By Michael Carvell
Everybody pretty much agrees that college recruiting and signing day has turned into a circus.
Georgia Tech coach Paul Johnson has an idea on how to fix some of the issues:
“If I were going to do it, I’d go back to the old way where every team had 85 scholarships. You could sign no more than 25 in a year, and you could sign them whenever.
“Once they started classes for their senior year of high school, they are fair game. And when you’ve got your 25, then you’re finished. If those guys didn’t qualify or didn’t make it, you couldn’t replace them. You took those 25.
“Then it would put the onus on the better student-athletes doing it the right way. If (others) were good enough players and you wanted to take a chance on them not making it, you could take them but they would be one of your 25. You couldn’t go back and replace them when they didn’t make it.
“That way, you would stop all the foolishness, too. There would be no commitments because if a kid says ‘Yeah, I want to come,’ then you’d give them the papers and they would sign. If they weren’t ready, they’d wait until the end of the signing period.”
And what would be the result of doing it this way?
“I think what would happen is … I don’t know how many you would see sign early, but there would be some who know what school they wanted to go to. They’ve been wanting to go there forever. And they’ll know that a school has only 25 scholarships. Once a school would sign 23 guys, and you wanted to go to school there, you better take it.
“It would help the kids. And it would help everybody. If you’re (a kid and) not ready, and you don’t know where you want to go, you’d say ‘Hey, I’m not ready. I’m going to take my visits and decide later.’ It would stop all the foolishness and craziness that goes on.”
We always like it when people think outside of the box.
The positives of having an early signing period – or really no signing period – would include ceasing a lot of the current drama that drags on until February (and is so much fun to follow and read about). It would also take away a lot of distractions from high school seniors trying to focus on academics and graduation, along with severely cut down on the amount of time that college coaches have to waste on a kid who commits early but continues to flirt with the competition.
Probably the biggest negative (and the real reason I suspect we don’t have an early signing period in football) would be kids and colleges stuck with each other if there’s a coaching change. If a kid signs early with a coach and that coach is later fired after the season, then the new coach may want his own recruits or the kid may want to play elsewhere because of the change. It’s a rough situation for both parties.
However, both sides seem to deal with this issue just fine in every other college sport where there’s an early signing period, although the recruiting classes are much, much smaller in the other sports.
.