Official Miami will stomp Fsu on 2/25 Thread

Advertisement
BTW. This game was actually eerily similar to our game w/ them in Jan of ‘22…. Except we came up on the sh*t side twice.
 

Attachments

  • 970D8591-FB4A-439E-BA59-A5AAC6E5DED0.png
    970D8591-FB4A-439E-BA59-A5AAC6E5DED0.png
    2.8 MB · Views: 16
Advertisement
It does and I threw one at a one poster who never posts here that posted the university sucks at everything. Well guess what? **** him.
You’re not the problem here in any remote way and your use of it in that instance isn’t the problem either. But too many here use these things in a way that stirs up trouble.
 
Advertisement
Well, at least we are nbr 1 on Sportscenter (highlights) now... what was that Hedda Hopper said about bad publicity being good?
 
I don’t mind the 🖕🏼 emoji but the boring and facepalm are trouble starters..
For me the 🖕and boring and dumb one are the worst. The facepalm is less troubling to me but I’d be fine killing it too. The only person I’ve seen it set off is CIO. Lol
 
Too much iso from him. He can make big shots but he takes a lot of bad ones and he's a walking turnover late in games.

It’s interesting though. His best shot comes from iso on a step back three. It’s when he drives into traffic it’s trouble. He needs to look to kick it when everyone collapses and give someone else a good look.
 
It does and I threw one at a one poster who never posts here that posted the university sucks at everything. Well guess what? **** him.
Classy. So are you in charge of who gets to post here then? That's cool because that was me you flipped off. I hardly post here, my bad I don't do much of that. Watch them all the time and have been happy with them till today. You don't lose a game like this and not expect people to vent. I guess only positive posts are allowed or people who post 100s of times a day? And yes I wasn't shocked we lost because that's our thing now right? Was hoping things were different and had some hope finally but as I agreed with some prominent poster on here I was wrong. Cool though dude hope I made your day. Guess I'll be sent to purgatory now. Thanks!
 
Advertisement
There is no reason for a middle finger emoji. Can we not get rid of that?

I dont agree that the dumb post emoji starts fights.
I’ll just agree to disagree. They’re all a problem. They’re all abused by a subset of the board. There is no one more learned and wise on the subject matter than @Angry Ibis given his angry nature. It is his determination as well.
 
We need a UVa loss @UNC and UVa win @ Clemson.... to clear the mud
Miami has the tiebreaker against Clemson. You have to look at the tiebreaker if we beat Pitt. I don't care enough to do the math right now.
________________________________________________________________
When two teams are tied in the standings, regular season head-to-head results are used as the tiebreaker.

b. If the tied teams played each other twice in the regular season and split their games, then each team’s record against the team occupying the highest position in the final regular-season standings (or in case of a tie for first place, the next highest position in the regular-season standings) and then continuing down through the standings until one team gains an advantage.

  • 1) When arriving at another pair of tied teams while comparing records, use each team’s record against the collective tied teams as a group (prior to their own tiebreaking procedures), rather than the performance against the individual tied teams.
  • 2) When comparing records against a single team or a group of teams, the higher winning percentage shall prevail, even if the number of games played against a team or group is unequal (e.g., 2-0 is better than 3-1; 1-0 is the same as 2-0; 2-1 is the same as 4-2; 1-0 is better than 1-1; 0-1 is the same as 0-3). If the winning percentage of the tied teams is equal against a team or group of tied teams, continue down through the standings until one team gains an advantage.
 
Advertisement
There is no reason for a middle finger emoji. Can we not get rid of that?

I dont agree that the dumb post emoji starts fights.

It was my post about Wong (which was right btw) you tried to resurrect the dumb post emoji. I’m already in a shi**y mood, now I want to kill you. So you’re wrong. It does start fights, as*hole.


;)
 
Classy. So are you in charge of who gets to post here then? That's cool because that was me you flipped off. I hardly post here, my bad I don't do much of that. Watch them all the time and have been happy with them till today. You don't lose a game like this and not expect people to vent. I guess only positive posts are allowed or people who post 100s of times a day? And yes I wasn't shocked we lost because that's our thing now right? Was hoping things were different and had some hope finally but as I agreed with some prominent poster on here I was wrong. Cool though dude hope I made your day. Guess I'll be sent to purgatory now. Thanks!
You’re not going to purgatory and this just proves the point that some of these emoji’s aren’t helpful.
 
Nope. I’ll go on a tear on the users en masse were it permitted. These people have enough negative options.

That thing starts fights and we have enough of that on here. I see you trying to de-escalate the tensions here by stopping posters from posting the showdown gif. I get it but why would you do that and then push for this???

The dumb post does not start fights. The idea is to address the post and not the poster. Showdown stuff is between posters. The dumb post emoji is for... well, dumb POSTS.

There's a world of difference between "You're an idiot" and "That's an idiotic thing to say." One attacks the person, the other attacks the content of their post, which is always free game.
ezgif-5-f949cc675cb4.gif
 
It was my post about Wong (which was right btw) you tried to resurrect the dumb post emoji. I’m already in a shi**y mood, now I want to kill you. So you’re wrong. It does start fights, as*hole.


;)
I’ll assume this is some kind of tongue and cheek humor thing you and SFBay have going.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top