Doesn't the fact that a private organization is investigation on of it's member institutions in tandem with somebody with a vested interest in harming the investigatee mean anything in the legal world? Doesn't the NCAA working with this *****, on this case, indicate some kind of malicious intent on behalf of the NCAA that could be grounds for prosecution in itself? Doesn't the enforcement committee claim to be impartial, and are they in any way, shape, or form, and are they required to be, by some form of corporate law or regulation?