Major news on NCAA investigation

[hoops156]

for what its worth. go listen to sedanos podcast from his show yesterday. it was pretty much all on this. he said he spoke to ppl "in the know" but also take that for what it is. not saying its the truth just an interesting convo on the same topic and some interviews thrown in there i think with desmond howard and who im pretty sure was omar kelly

 

[Oh Snap]

 

[JHCane]

Fwiw if we get worse then USC no one will ever again cooperate with the NCAA. I think it's a possibility however. The NCAA just suspended 2 FR bball players because their legal guardian donated $185 to Indiana over a 20 year period and that made him a "booster."

There was a lot more to that story than just $185. Google Indiana Elite AAU team and you will find out a bunch more about it.

 

[Cane Steve]

And as I said earlier, this info is not coming from Miami.

Hey D-Moni,

Could you give us a Hypothetical timeline of what happens next if this were to be true........

Obviously, I'm not DMoney, but I do know how this stuff works...



If UM received the NOA on December 1, there might be a decision on sanctions by about June, but probably later. Enforcement has 30 days from sending the COI to make all evidence it intends to use at the hearing to UM. UM gets 90 days to respond the NOA. The parties then have 30 days to convene for a prehearing conference. Enforcement then has to give a case summary to COI within 14 days before the hearing (hearings are only held 6 times a year). The COI's decision will take at least 6 weeks, but probably longer (the decision in the UNC case took 4.5 months). If the decision takes as long as UNC's did, the UM will learn its sanctions around the beginning of next football season (September).

FML

2 years of this ****. NCAA is almost as beaucratic as the government...

 

[Peruche]

And as I said earlier, this info is not coming from Miami.

Hey D-Moni,

Could you give us a Hypothetical timeline of what happens next if this were to be true........

Obviously, I'm not DMoney, but I do know how this stuff works...



If UM received the NOA on December 1, there might be a decision on sanctions by about June, but probably later. Enforcement has 30 days from sending the COI to make all evidence it intends to use at the hearing to UM. UM gets 90 days to respond the NOA. The parties then have 30 days to convene for a prehearing conference. Enforcement then has to give a case summary to COI within 14 days before the hearing (hearings are only held 6 times a year). The COI's decision will take at least 6 weeks, but probably longer (the decision in the UNC case took 4.5 months). If the decision takes as long as UNC's did, the UM will learn its sanctions around the beginning of next football season (September).

Thanks Dapper......

For some reason I tend to feel like UM won't exhaust the whole 90 days and that the timeline will be shorter than expected.....

ONE last question.......

If allegations are minimal would that lead you to believe that sanctions will be handed out sooner than later......

If we do play a bowl wouldn't that be a good sign....

Sorry 2 questions.....

Thanks again....

 

[Consigliere]

Fwiw if we get worse then USC no one will ever again cooperate with the NCAA. I think it's a possibility however.

Either Emert is a genius for giving us a lot of credit for being helpful or he just made his job impossible.

 

[CaneInHeelCountry]

And as I said earlier, this info is not coming from Miami.

Hey D-Moni,

Could you give us a Hypothetical timeline of what happens next if this were to be true........

Obviously, I'm not DMoney, but I do know how this stuff works...



If UM received the NOA on December 1, there might be a decision on sanctions by about June, but probably later. Enforcement has 30 days from sending the COI to make all evidence it intends to use at the hearing available to UM. UM gets 90 days to respond the NOA. The parties then have 30 days to convene for a prehearing conference. Enforcement then has to give a case summary to COI within 14 days before the hearing (hearings are only held 6 times a year). The COI's decision will take at least 6 weeks, but probably longer (the decision in the UNC case took 4.5 months). If the decision takes as long as UNC's did, the UM will learn its sanctions around the beginning of next football season (September).

Since UM has been working in conjunction with the NCAA during this whole process, it seems likely to me that the process will go much more swiftly than it did with UNC, and that UM won't need its full allotment of time in order to respond to these things.

 

[UMmike]

And as I said earlier, this info is not coming from Miami.

Hey D-Moni,

Could you give us a Hypothetical timeline of what happens next if this were to be true........

Obviously, I'm not DMoney, but I do know how this stuff works...



If UM received the NOA on December 1, there might be a decision on sanctions by about June, but probably later. Enforcement has 30 days from sending the COI to make all evidence it intends to use at the hearing to UM. UM gets 90 days to respond the NOA. The parties then have 30 days to convene for a prehearing conference. Enforcement then has to give a case summary to COI within 14 days before the hearing (hearings are only held 6 times a year). The COI's decision will take at least 6 weeks, but probably longer (the decision in the UNC case took 4.5 months). If the decision takes as long as UNC's did, the UM will learn its sanctions around the beginning of next football season (September).

FML

2 years of this ****. NCAA is almost as beaucratic as the government...

WAAAAAY slower than the government in this case. From the time the story broke to the time we get our sanctions officially handed out, Sandusky will have been arrested, tried, convicted, prepared his **** 9,863 times for his cellmate, shanked to death, and rotting in ****.

 

[BrazilCane]

 

[DapperSlapper]

And as I said earlier, this info is not coming from Miami.

Hey D-Moni,

Could you give us a Hypothetical timeline of what happens next if this were to be true........

Obviously, I'm not DMoney, but I do know how this stuff works...



If UM received the NOA on December 1, there might be a decision on sanctions by about June, but probably later. Enforcement has 30 days from sending the COI to make all evidence it intends to use at the hearing to UM. UM gets 90 days to respond the NOA. The parties then have 30 days to convene for a prehearing conference. Enforcement then has to give a case summary to COI within 14 days before the hearing (hearings are only held 6 times a year). The COI's decision will take at least 6 weeks, but probably longer (the decision in the UNC case took 4.5 months). If the decision takes as long as UNC's did, the UM will learn its sanctions around the beginning of next football season (September).

Thanks Dapper......

For some reason I tend to feel like UM won't exhaust the whole 90 days and that the timeline will be shorter than expected.....

ONE last question.......

If allegations are minimal would that lead you to believe that sanctions will be handed out sooner than later......

If we do play a bowl wouldn't that be a good sign....

Sorry 2 questions.....

Thanks again....

I think the Herald has reported that UM will take the full 90 days they have to respond to the NOA (they could even ask for more time if they want to). The timeline will not necessarily be moved up if the allegations are minimal. There are a number of factors (one of which is that the COI members are unpaid volunteers and have jobs and lives outside of serving on the COI).

If we play in the ACC Championship Game/bowl game, we can only hope it's because UM feels the provable allegations will not be worth a second postseason ban from the NCAA. If you have faith in UM (in conjunction with outside counsel) to make the right decision, then I guess you could view playing postseason games this season as a good sign.

 

[tsimonitis]

And as I said earlier, this info is not coming from Miami.

Hey D-Moni,

Could you give us a Hypothetical timeline of what happens next if this were to be true........

Obviously, I'm not DMoney, but I do know how this stuff works...



If UM received the NOA on December 1, there might be a decision on sanctions by about June, but probably later. Enforcement has 30 days from sending the COI to make all evidence it intends to use at the hearing to UM. UM gets 90 days to respond the NOA. The parties then have 30 days to convene for a prehearing conference. Enforcement then has to give a case summary to COI within 14 days before the hearing (hearings are only held 6 times a year). The COI's decision will take at least 6 weeks, but probably longer (the decision in the UNC case took 4.5 months). If the decision takes as long as UNC's did, the UM will learn its sanctions around the beginning of next football season (September).

Thanks Dapper......

For some reason I tend to feel like UM won't exhaust the whole 90 days and that the timeline will be shorter than expected.....

ONE last question.......

If allegations are minimal would that lead you to believe that sanctions will be handed out sooner than later......

If we do play a bowl wouldn't that be a good sign....

Sorry 2 questions.....

Thanks again....

I think the Herald has reported that UM will take the full 90 days they have to respond to the NOA (they could even ask for more time if they want to). The timeline will not necessarily be moved up if the allegations are minimal. There are a number of factors (one of which is that the COI members are unpaid volunteers and have jobs and lives outside of serving on the COI).

If we play in the ACC Championship Game/bowl game, we can only hope it's because UM feels the provable allegations will not be worth a second postseason ban from the NCAA. If you have faith in UM (in conjunction with outside counsel) to make the right decision, then I guess you could view playing postseason games this season as a good sign.

Paging Wezzies, where do I sign up?

 

[Larry]

If we get hit harder than I expect...I'll give credit to this program for having more squealers than I originally thought. 'Dem Coker boys loved to talk...why else do you think Randy put the ol KIBOSH on open forum chats after practice and limited player interaction with the media? But ****, ratting out your own wrong doing to the detriment of your University? That'd be some low class behavior, but the more I think it through, the more I think its possible we got a lot of players that just put the University on the train track.

 

[UMJer026]

Here's a good summary of the process:
http://www.miami.edu/index.php/ncaa_investigation/the_process

 

[Canesfan1899]

Well boys

No matter what, my **** is ready

I mean we skatin. . . Right?

 

[4th-and-14]

Valchek: And I should tell him, what? Make nice or invest heavily in petroleum jelly?
Carcetti: Hey, his ***, his choice.

 

[DapperSlapper]

Well boys

No matter what, my **** is ready

I mean we skatin. . . Right?

Behold, the NOA, in all its glory:

http://soulrebe8.wix.com/umnoa#!home/mainPage

 

[Bigtip]

30 schollies over a 4 year period, 4-5 years probation, 500k - 1 million fine, 2-3 year bowl ban, and a crap load of show of causes. This is my guess; however, that is a long time down the road, we won't hear that for about another 6 months. The LOA will only list the allegations.

that is an absolute *** raping. i doubt is will be that bad

 

[GhostofVenice01]

 

[deleted1562]

DMoney you gotta give us some more info than that dude. What's up?

 

[Larry]

I'm tellin' ya'll boys...our program was filled with a buncha butthurt re-neggers.

When that article about Kyle Wright came out...it was a little glimpse into the *****assness that overrun this program.