- Joined
- Jan 12, 2014
- Messages
- 56,610
Why does paying for it, if you can afford it, trigger a black man issue? I mean regardless of income level, or race, many of us have spent more time than we should have at some point in our lives being distracted by chasing after a woman or women. And really, if there’s some issue that’s race tainted from historical events, I’ll just defer to others on here who are black men, for their opinions on that as I’ve learned not to tell others how they should feel about things of this nature when I didn’t experience their events in their shoes.It's easy for you to say that, when your community doesn't have an avg salary in this country of $40-50k.
By and large, Black men in this country are spending way too much time chasing ***, and trying to become masters of "game". The negative stigma towards paying to play, makes no sense, when the overwhelming majority of men are low value. No other group of people think this way except them.
Think about how much of a troglodyte someone must be, to go to some rachet ***, grimey club, in their 50's, in order to "GeT SoMe ***** OFf ThE LiP"
That aside, It shouldn’t be a judgement thing anyhow. It’s preference. Like I understand if you have money where it doesn’t matter, and your thing is ***king as many physical dimes as you can - maximizing your time - then to me - what you do makes sense for you. Like I get it. I think others get it too.
Likewise, someone in the same fortunate financial situation as you may see the best use of their spare time as being a different hobby - like fishing, hunting or having a wife or girlfriend they travel with… or whatever. Whereas your hobby is sportfukking dimes in bulk, that’s not their hobby. That doesn’t make them beta failures.
Do you get this… that people of the same wealth levels can have their own priorities which differ from their peers?