forums

Jason Taylor Interviewed By Joy Taylor On Cowherd

Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement
RVACane said:
Who’s the guy in your avatar?
Click to expand...

Just some random pic I found on an image aggregator site. I was getting some flak for my previous avatars of Santo jr, so I wanted to pick a new one which could be seen as less divisive. Lol
 
Trafficante said:
Just some random pic I found on an image aggregator site. I was getting some flak for my previous avatars of Santo jr, so I wanted to pick a new one which could be seen as less divisive. Lol
Click to expand...

Why would anybody give you flak over Santo Trafficante? Why because he was a mob boss? Who cares. You should bring him back and it goes with ur name
 
Trafficante said:
Imo, it's always better to be viewed as a mark-a*s trick by low value, bum a*s ninjas, than it is to actually BE a low value, bum a*s ninja. Keep that in mind

Getting "free" P is not nearly the flex that u think it is big dogg. In America, simply winning the genetics lottery will qualify u to receive sexual access from American women, because they're the most empowered & sexually liberated in the history of the planet. They routinely have sexual relations with men they're not romantically involved with; this is evidenced by the number of women today that are involved in situationships & polyamorous arrangements.

Instead, a greater flex is when an avg man ends up becoming high value. This is only possible if he embraces the hero's journey, & becomes so driven, that he outworks even his own potential. Whenever this man gets "free" P from a good looking woman, u know its only because he was able to maximize ALL aspects of his attractiveness & earning potential. This is why high value men have to be able to do BOTH. Relying only on P2P means that u don't care about maximizing your attractiveness as it relates to physical appearance, style, personality, charisma, etc. And relying only on "free" P means that u don't value your time or resources. In order to be efficient, there has to be a time & place for BOTH. I figured someone like u, who rails incessantly against complacency & mediocrity would be able to understand this.
Click to expand...
tenor.gif
 
Angry Ibis said:
After a lengthy argument no one else cares about, her and our very own Skip no Words would have a good go at it, she’d give him the Bayless discount.
Click to expand...

That would be unfortunate, because I can make the argument that it's probably one of the most important things u should care about. However, as the saying goes stupid stays stuck. Stay blessed pimp
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
Advertisement
PIPO said:
@cway313 @*****-Wan Kanobi

Click to expand...


Wow; just wow. I don't even know where to begin with this 304; her lack of self-awareness & accountability is astonishing to say the least. In her little mind, she's actually assigning the majority of the blame for the current state of intergender dynamics in the U.S on men. She doesn't understand that the more empowered a woman becomes, the smaller her pool of prospective partners, because the default mating strategy of women is Hypergamy & in the U.S, the majority of the women are all pursuing the elite, top 20% of men. There's obviously very little chance that these women will ever be able to secure a long-term commitment from these men, so they end up sharing them sexually instead, because in the U.S women empowerment also means sexual liberation & hookup culture. What incentive is there for a man in the top 20% to ever get married, if he's able to receive unlimited sexual access without it? This helps to explain why there are more single men in certain age demographics than women, because women who are in situationships, mistakenly believe they are involved in monogamous relationships when they're clearly not.

 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top