- Joined
- Apr 28, 2014
- Messages
- 16,669
I disagree, the last thing you want when you have an elite offense is to make it easy as **** for opposing teams to score TDs. You're basically assuming that our defense could just get dinked and dunked the full length of the field for like 6+ possessions a game without getting stops. Every drive that ends in a FG or less significantly increases our likelihood of winning due to our offensive firepower. I very much doubt many teams would be able to just have multiple 75+ yard drives of just getting 5-10 yards a pop on us. The most important reason being that we just are more talented plus our DLine is by far the strength of our D. I'd count on them making at least a handful or two of impactful plays per game that put the opposing offense in a corner. What we need is to not be putting ourselves in the situation where we are totally reliant on a safety making a 1v1 tackle on the RB outside the numbers with absolutely no help.I've seen this sentiment across this thread and I just think it's wrong -- changing to soft zones, making teams go down the field 5-10 yards at a time etc is the exact opposite of what this team should be doing. of course 50-70 yard TDs need to be cut down drastically but we want Cam to have the ball as much as possible. asking teams to march down the field is just allowing them to control the clock and maximizes the amount of time the defense is on the field. obviously, that's the opposite of what we want, which is for our offense to be on the field.
clearly games like UF or USF where we're scoring 40-50 points and winning by 20-30 points are ideal, but if we're going to be in close games we want them to be 38-34 type shootouts where teams have to match our QB and WRs and not 28-24 slogs where our defense is playing safe and letting possessions be squeezed out of the game.
Our Defense plays good on like 90% of plays. Over the last 3 games teams are averaging 5.7 yds/play against us (like 73rd in country over that span). That is mostly because of how many 20+ yard plays we are allowing. Over the last 3 games we have allowed 15 total 20+ yard plays, 5 of which were 50+ yarders (4 of them against Cal!). Yet we're allowing like legit <57% comp% and <33% 3rd down conv%....
Regardless HOW it is done, we need to cut opponents big play rate in half. It's going to be difficult to do that without it leading to giving up some longer drives. But if that's the tradeoff it is fine if at the end of the day we are still holding them to a FG or less.... If we were being aggressive and could tackle so these huge plays we were giving up weren't happening THIS often, I'd be fine with it. My goal is just to limit the agressiveness enough so that rate gets cut in half. From there I think we are good.