Cookie917
Recruit
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2017
- Messages
- 3,516
Your grammatical skills are those of a '28 year old' high school student who is trying to pass his GRE for the umpteenth time. Time to place you on ignore with the gnome............
You are also becoming hysterical. Take a valium or something......
I worked for a hedge-fund based out of Atlanta for 4-years. The CEO of the Fund contributed $100,000 per annum to the 'Dawg Foundation. The funds were solely and STRICTLY to be used to pay players during the recruiting process. I suffered through the Michel recruiting saga, knowing that they paid him $200,0000....................
If you cannot understand how these payments are grossly illegal, then I cannot help you. I read through the NCAA basketball docket and there are ample charges with which to charge these teams.
Any payment over $14,000 is taxable. If you cannot comprehend the ramifications of that, then we cannot help you. Continue your ramblings ad nauseum.
wait wait wait.... not only do you know the IRS Director for the entire Southern and West Coast Regions, you also personally know someone donating 6 figures to a fund that is used "STRICTLY" to pay players!?!?! First off, I am unsure why you capitalize your letters, is it for dramatic effect? persuasiveness? Secondly, sounds like you could bring the whole thing down with your vast knowledge accompanied with the way people seemingly disclose information to you at free will.
Again you failed to answer my question and instead threw out some random BS that you think is relevant. A few things, if the 'Dawg Foundation does exist, I can guarantee not all payments go directly to players. There has to be at least some form of a reputable foundation.
And again, I am not saying receiving substantial payments are legal, focus on the word substantial, I believe I could go give a kid $1,000 today to choose miami, miami would have no knowledge of this, and perhaps the kid or myself violated NCAA rules but that payment is not "illegal" tell me what law I violated?
I think the IRS has a great case against the foundations and the players/families who get these large sums but not the SEC or schools without some type of smoking gun. The NCAA docket is not charging players, it is charging Adidas and bringing in some schools for the conspiracy aspect. The kicker is that the school had to know or participate in the scheme. That is why Miami got dropped from the case, from all reports Adidas did try to get Little to UM but UM had no knowledge of this payment plan.
Oh and also using words like "ad nauseum" and "populace" make you seem like the one trying to pass the GRE bub, I hope you put me on ignore because I'm tired of responding to your absolute nonsense. Go run and hide because you clearly are in over your head.