The Bay Area has kids, but honestly some of them get pimped out to Mater Dei because of Malu(Najee old trainer). Jordan Davidson and Phillip Bell being examples this year. My brother attended Pitt High, they are getting transfers there now. Only problem is those kids need time to be coached/learn how to be a student athlete. De La doesn't produce like it used to, honestly for the past decade they have been down because they do not recruit like they should imo.Eh, not sure bay area is worth really recruiting much. Like there might be like 5 four star guys in CA from NorCal this year.
But on a yearly basis maybe like De La Salle and Pittsburgh High would be fine to recruit, and they're like 20mins from each other. So maybe you treat that like Gorman ish (not as many quality players though). If I were focusing somewhere in Norcal It'd probably be Sacramento area right now?... but ultimately Southern Cal is where you wanna be if you're really targeting top players, and it's not particularly close. I actually think we could do quite well in LA, especially if we are actually good. Like I really don't think LA kids are dying to play for SEC programs. They're doing it because they were good. If we are good, I have no doubt they'd choose us over a Bama/Oklahoma... But USC is still king in LA if they want to be imo.
Anyways I'd leave NorCal alone. Much rather spend the money recruiting Texas or VA/NJ or something.
Like @Rellyrell said before, be careful with those Sac kids... I agree that THEY need to spend more resources in Texas, but the Bay is good for a great TE, RB, or some solid OL every year.