Who cares if he had only a month? saban ( a coach you guys like to compare him too) had less time and he brought in kareem jackson. pete carrol has less time and brought in good players at need positions. lol at these excuses you guys come up with. pay attention to the rest of cfb.
This is the most potatoe'd bull**** line you trot out there. Neither Saban nor Carrol had significantly more successful seasons than did Golden in year 1. There's no way to tell, yet, if any of the guys Golden brought in in year 1 will be impact guys or not. Jackson was a juco kid, and not a bigtime recruit until Saban got involved. You may turn out to be right, but there is no possible way to know yet. You certainly can't throw this tripe out as if it were fact, yet.
Stop tryin to creat BS. no one said anything about success record wise and JAckson started 12 of 13 games as a true frosh. GTFOOH with that JUCO BS you made that up. Jackson went to prep school and played 3 years at Bama and who gibves a **** if he wasn't a big time recruit. that statement is meaningless. Saban identified a need and went out and got an impact player at a need position.
The point is saban, in less time, went out and got an impact player at a need position.
LMAO @ you trying to campare saban's first year to Golden's based on record alone when 2 of saban losses came to final ap #1 and #2 teams. Golden had losses to 2-10 amryland (LMFAO) and 4-8 BC. a dam shame.
Juco. Prep. Big ******* deal. Your point is still impossible to defend at this moment in time. You're already ******* backtracking. "who gibves a **** if he wasn't a big time recruit." Bigtime recruits are generally good players, often at positions of need. You're equivocating because your point is retarded.
At this point, it's pretty **** easy to say he was a big time, impact player, after his career is wrapped up. We could be saying the same things about Perryman, Chick, Bush, Howard, or a number of players Golden brought in already. I've never said you'll always be wrong. I'm saying you're stuck on a bull**** point in an effort to discredit a coach who has ample opportunity to do exactly what you're saying he hasn't. Your comments on the losses are infuriating, but they have merit. This bull**** doesn't.