Morris had more to do with ruining the defense than anyone. they were great early on. then we were at the bottom of FBS in time of possession and our lack of depth got exposed
You can't be serious with this garbage. Having Joe Montana back there wouldn't have changed that abomination referred to as a defense.
The excuse making on this board is reaching all time highs.
So an undermanned defense playing more minutes than necessary isn't a factor in performance?
Okay.
Having all-time greats all over the field is the expectation
Agree, but it takes time to stack the team with that kind of talent and depth.
There's NFL talent on the defense now. It's time to get results.
The interview was solid. Excuse me if I don't lose any sleep that Alfred doesn't get eviscerated by the local media during acutal interviews so that some of you might get a little tingling in your pants as you somehow feel validated. We get some of the worst overall treatment in ALL of college sports by not only the national media but by the majority of the local clowns so Golden not getting totally taken to the woodshed by O here is of no concern to me as it would be of no concern to the powers to be in the Gables that control coaching decisions.
wow this guy is not scared of golden
Big O has always been known for not shying away from asking the tough questions.
He's a good interviewer.
Glad he's back on WQAM.
Morris had more to do with ruining the defense than anyone. they were great early on. then we were at the bottom of FBS in time of possession and our lack of depth got exposed
You can't be serious with this garbage. Having Joe Montana back there wouldn't have changed that abomination referred to as a defense.
The excuse making on this board is reaching all time highs.
So an undermanned defense playing more minutes than necessary isn't a factor in performance?
Okay.
There are dudes on here that will tell you losing #8 had no impact on the defensive performance also.
They walk among us.
Having all-time greats all over the field is the expectation
Agree, but it takes time to stack the team with that kind of talent and depth.
There's NFL talent on the defense now. It's time to get results.
Guysm when we play a bend don't break defense and fail to stop third down conversions, that cannot be blamed on the defense. That's because duke Johnson was hurt. Football logic 101.Morris had more to do with ruining the defense than anyone. they were great early on. then we were at the bottom of FBS in time of possession and our lack of depth got exposed
You can't be serious with this garbage. Having Joe Montana back there wouldn't have changed that abomination referred to as a defense.
The excuse making on this board is reaching all time highs.
So an undermanned defense playing more minutes than necessary isn't a factor in performance?
Okay.
There are dudes on here that will tell you losing #8 had no impact on the defensive performance also.
They walk among us.
There are dudes on here that will tell you losing #8 was the sole reason we were blown out by Virginia Tech, Duke, and Louisville.
They walk among us.
Morris had more to do with ruining the defense than anyone. they were great early on. then we were at the bottom of FBS in time of possession and our lack of depth got exposed
You can't be serious with this garbage. Having Joe Montana back there wouldn't have changed that abomination referred to as a defense.
The excuse making on this board is reaching all time highs.
So an undermanned defense playing more minutes than necessary isn't a factor in performance?
Okay.
There are dudes on here that will tell you losing #8 had no impact on the defensive performance also.
They walk among us.
Guysm when we play a bend don't break defense and fail to stop third down conversions, that cannot be blamed on the defense. That's because duke Johnson was hurt. Football logic 101.You can't be serious with this garbage. Having Joe Montana back there wouldn't have changed that abomination referred to as a defense.
The excuse making on this board is reaching all time highs.
So an undermanned defense playing more minutes than necessary isn't a factor in performance?
Okay.
There are dudes on here that will tell you losing #8 had no impact on the defensive performance also.
They walk among us.
There are dudes on here that will tell you losing #8 was the sole reason we were blown out by Virginia Tech, Duke, and Louisville.
They walk among us.
if you have to jump through hoops to defend al golden or the defense then there's clearly something wrong.
At this point the time for talking is over. We will see on Monday whether there has been improvement. Of course Louisville having a new coach makes a difference, but other than that, you couldn't have a better barometer than comparing the team's performance this week to the bowl game last year. We shall see how much a difference another year of experience, another year with coach D's system, better talent, and recouping from last year's injuries makes.
I would say him saying that he doesn't classify him as a friend is in no way a deflection. I think that's an answer most of us needed to hear."How hard is it to defend your friend, D'Onfrio"?
Al: He doesn't classify him as his friend. It takes time and they have to continue to make the climb back and have confidence in the players. They're improving....blah blah blah.
Deflected that one.
I like this new Al Golden, no excuses, fired up and ready to go
That's what I don't get. People always ripping him for giving excuses and BigO was trying to give him an excuse and Golden didn't want to take it. Not sure how that isn't a good thing or at least what you want to hear. Now saying that obviously all that matters is winning and proving it but at least he didn't take the easy way out and say yea we don't have those players we aren't going to be that good we have a Freshman QB he is going to struggle. Nothing along those lines came out of his mouth.
I like this new Al Golden, no excuses, fired up and ready to go
That's what I don't get. People always ripping him for giving excuses and BigO was trying to give him an excuse and Golden didn't want to take it. Not sure how that isn't a good thing or at least what you want to hear. Now saying that obviously all that matters is winning and proving it but at least he didn't take the easy way out and say yea we don't have those players we aren't going to be that good we have a Freshman QB he is going to struggle. Nothing along those lines came out of his mouth.
It's easy to have no excuses when the season hasn't even started yet.
Morris had more to do with ruining the defense than anyone. they were great early on. then we were at the bottom of FBS in time of possession and our lack of depth got exposed
You can't be serious with this garbage. Having Joe Montana back there wouldn't have changed that abomination referred to as a defense.
The excuse making on this board is reaching all time highs.
So an undermanned defense playing more minutes than necessary isn't a factor in performance?
Okay.
There are dudes on here that will tell you losing #8 had no impact on the defensive performance also.
They walk among us.
This is just a guess but uf had a terrible O n there D was still solid.
I like this new Al Golden, no excuses, fired up and ready to go
That's what I don't get. People always ripping him for giving excuses and BigO was trying to give him an excuse and Golden didn't want to take it. Not sure how that isn't a good thing or at least what you want to hear. Now saying that obviously all that matters is winning and proving it but at least he didn't take the easy way out and say yea we don't have those players we aren't going to be that good we have a Freshman QB he is going to struggle. Nothing along those lines came out of his mouth.
It's easy to have no excuses when the season hasn't even started yet.
Take everything he's said about "The Cloud" for the last 2 years, replace those two words with "Freshman Quarterback" and you've basically reverse engineered your way into a synopsis of every Al Golden interview between now and season's end.
wow this guy is not scared of golden
Big O has always been known for not shying away from asking the tough questions.
He's a good interviewer.
Glad he's back on WQAM.
I had a very different impression. I thought he was atrocious. I'm not from Miami, so I have never heard this guy before. I thought some of his questions were kind of stupid, like when he said there was "no Jon Beason, no Ray Lewis..." at LB. Well, I'm not saying Perryman is that good, but he's still pretty **** good, and might be at a level of Beason. I am not the best judge of talent, though, so tell me if I'm wrong.