I can see why some will be sort of pessimistic(with this class at least, very happy with 2018 and 2020). We just got work to dothat’s all. Should be an interesting finishI really don't know who will end up being 4 stars but point being that what the coaches are seeing in a lot of these current 3 stars, other big time programs are seeing too. I trust our coaches know talent when they see it and apparently others in the biz agree with their assessment.
God shut upI am a huge fan of CMR and the amazing impact he has had since he arrived... with that said, feels like this class in a little heavy on 3 stars
Wanted to get thoughts from those of you that are a little (or a lot) more up to speed on the talent we are signing ?
Thanks in advance and Go Canes
Munoz is getting raving reviews from first ballot HOF and legend Jason Taylor. That's enough for meonly guy that isn't UM caliber is good and maybe munoz cause he is unproven.
It’s clear some of you guys have never played football a day in your lives. There are 3 stars and then there are 3 stars. Some have potential through the roof and just need that Senior season to put it all together. And others are just downright jags who are overrated, should be 2 stars and are simply not a fit for our program. A good coach knows the difference.
So if you think the overrated 3 Star jag from Ohio is the same as an underrated 3 Star diamond in the rough from FL/GA who just needs a Senior season to put it all toegether then you need to step away from recruiting.
The OP is not a troll. You don’t need to be insulting to make your point. All a fan can do is speculate. There may be a handful of people on this board who actually have real knowledge. You may be one. Who knows but don’t compromise whatever good info you have degrading another poster.
To be Honest that number 1 class in 2008 was not top 5 in star rating. They were number 1 because the had over 30 recruitsSay it alil louder for the people in the back
Yes? Have you looked at how 3 stars compare on average to 4 stars? Have you seen this debate happen every year and it's continually shown that 4 and 5 stars are indeed much better on average?Seriously this 3* **** again?
More stars are given to players with more talent.. or was your post sarcasm?These comments are ridiculous, basing kids off of stars and not talent smh