DT

Lu, I disagree about Hamilton to DT. Seen him on several occasions and his lower body just isn't prototypical for a DT. In other words, he's way too skinny below the waist. I agree with Larry that he needs to improve body composition. Very "top heavy" - at least last time I saw him.

Real talk - you saying he's a fat skinny guy?

Haha. I think he's saying he's not a dude with a big *** + thighs, which is what limits, as Larry noted, his ability to drop and anchor. I'm not gonna project this dude's growth in that area, so I'll just wait and see what happens over the next year. He's the type of guy who'd probably need to wait till year 3. And, I guess the fair point is that we need DTs right now.

Yeah that's what I've heard but I thought a while back Alex also mentioned that Hamilton has very little definition in his upper body - soft, as it were.

Nick Fairley and Warren Fapp have never been mistaken for Lee Haney.

This is a fair point. (Un)Fortunately, I did see Fapp with his shirt off after practice back at Greentree eons ago and while I would not call him an adonis, he's a guy that looked like he was country strong...if you feel me.
 
Advertisement
Lu, I disagree about Hamilton to DT. Seen him on several occasions and his lower body just isn't prototypical for a DT. In other words, he's way too skinny below the waist. I agree with Larry that he needs to improve body composition. Very "top heavy" - at least last time I saw him.

Real talk - you saying he's a fat skinny guy?

Haha. I think he's saying he's not a dude with a big *** + thighs, which is what limits, as Larry noted, his ability to drop and anchor. I'm not gonna project this dude's growth in that area, so I'll just wait and see what happens over the next year. He's the type of guy who'd probably need to wait till year 3. And, I guess the fair point is that we need DTs right now.

Yeah that's what I've heard but I thought a while back Alex also mentioned that Hamilton has very little definition in his upper body - soft, as it were.

Nick Fairley and Warren Fapp have never been mistaken for Lee Haney.

You are missing the point. Doesn't have the big butt and big thighs that you want with a DT. Earl Moore is a tank. ****, even King is a big boy. Hamilton, on the other hand, is a little light in the ***. He doesn't compare to the DTs that we currently have on the roster now, much less Fairley or Sapp.
 
Earl Moore will eat people's souls next season!

I'm excited to see that dude develop. For the guys claiming there are no impact DTs on the roster, they're going to be surprised at the metamorphosis many of these dudes undergo over the next few years.

Ivery is the guy that coaches love, supposedly. Too bad we had to burn his shirt this year, but I look forward to seeing how he'll develop this off season. I do like the Moore/Ivery tandem.
 
Alot of good stuff from posters here, solid thread






I think Moore with his build already with another year or 2 of Utough is gonna be just a beast in the middle hard to push around
 
Real talk - you saying he's a fat skinny guy?

Haha. I think he's saying he's not a dude with a big *** + thighs, which is what limits, as Larry noted, his ability to drop and anchor. I'm not gonna project this dude's growth in that area, so I'll just wait and see what happens over the next year. He's the type of guy who'd probably need to wait till year 3. And, I guess the fair point is that we need DTs right now.

Yeah that's what I've heard but I thought a while back Alex also mentioned that Hamilton has very little definition in his upper body - soft, as it were.

Nick Fairley and Warren Fapp have never been mistaken for Lee Haney.

You are missing the point. Doesn't have the big butt and big thighs that you want with a DT. Earl Moore is a tank. ****, even King is a big boy. Hamilton, on the other hand, is a little light in the ***. He doesn't compare to the DTs that we currently have on the roster now, much less Fairley or Sapp.

Thanks for your help, but I wasn't missing the point AU made. He mentioned that Hamilton has "very little definition in his UPPER BODY-soft as it were (emphasis added)". He turned the discussion to upper body defintion, which was a perfect place actually to mention 2 dudes with the upper body definition of newborn babies. Thanks though.
 
Advertisement
Speaking of Sapps strength, I saw him on ESPNs Ultimate Defender Competition vs other DL and LBs and he incline benched the 2nd highest @ 385. Dude is/was strong



La'Roi Glover beat him with 400lbs
 
Larry, no one would have thought Nick Fairley and Ndamokong Suh were All American, Lombardi types after their first couple years of college football either. We really need to see how those guys develop before we can make statements like you're making.

Suh was a 4 star DT. I agree we really need to see how these guys develop so long as we are still recruiting the sh*t out of the position until we find a rotation of studs.

Right now we aren't doing that. And that's the real point.

I don't care how many stars Suh had. He didn't do anything till his junior season, which was his 4th year in the program. Before that, he was a jag.

Nuff said.

You just proved you don't know WTF you are talking about and you obviously didn't follow Suhs entire career.

Boy showed flashes of dominance from the get. He was besdting already as a So. He was the best Dt in the country by year 3.

FWIW, that's not true. His 3rd year (RS So) he started 11 or 12 and had 34 tackles, 1 sack, 6 TFL (best DT in the country?).

His 4th year is when he really took the jump, 76 tackles, 7.5 sacks, 19 TFL. He then exploded his 5th year, 85 tackles, 12 sacks, 24 TFL.

FAIL.

His first season he took a medical shirt when he tore his knee. he didn't spend the year "developing" he spent it rehabbing.

He was FRESHMAN ALL BIG 12 the next season. That's instant impact.

The next season he was even more dominant even though the stats dont show. But you wouldn't know that because you didn't actually WATCH him play.

He was dominant already. His junior season he was already the best DT in the county. His senior season was all world.

But again way to fail to make a decent point in this thread. Its clear you only post to white knight the staff when you get a chance.

At least we know you can google because you have yet to post anything remotely resembling knowledge of football.
 
Last edited:
All of this talk of development is fine...but we are in December of Al's third recruiting class and he hasn't landed a single projectable impact defensive tackle prospect.

We can continue to blow smoke up all of our asses, but its a serious point of discussion at this point. This class cycle isn't over yet, but, its worrisome.

It was pretty unanimous that this class needed to feature multiple prospects at the position with at least one being ready to be ready to contribute significantly from Day 1. Lets not move the goal post.

No one is moving the goal posts. This class needed a Keith Bryant and/or a JuCo guy. I wouldn't really talk about his first class.

The relevant point to that, which is what is being discussed, is whether or not there is an impact DT on the roster that hasn't developed. Personally, I think Pierre may be that guy. I think we'll find out more next year and then on draft day in April of 2014.

I care nothing about draft prospectus...I care about collegiate production...draft position isn't about what you've done, its about what you will do...

As for impact DTs on the roster, its my assumption we have potential contributors, guys who will be good collegiate players, but no guys that project as legitimate impact defensive tackles. The All-American, the Lombardi, the Bednarik Award finalist, the legitimate, unanimous first-team All-Conference player...we need to get those guys and we haven't done it yet, and this class, in December, doesn't have one...even if it does get a Keith Bryant, that defensive tackle prospect won't project to that level for at least 3 years down the road. Meanwhile, Miami's going to continue struggling on defense to an extent because it lacks these types of players.

I said we'll find out more this year. The mention of his draft status was a reference to future validation that he's "the" talent we're discussing.

Aside from that, wasn't Jelani a 4* and wasn't Mccord a 4*? Ideally, they'd both have taken shirts and grown into their natural positions/impact, but if we see flashes from them this upcoming year and/or the next, don't they fit into the category you seek? Another point is that there are a slew of 2* and 3* guys that ball out - impact in college - later in their career. Are we writing off Ivery, King (despite being a Buddha on Wheels this year), and Moore already? Would it be that hard to believe that one of those guys makes a jump 2-3 years into college?

What's weird is some of you guys are making this into the rest of us saying we don't need further help...immediately. Obviously, we do. I just don't think it's as dire as it is being made out to be.

As I mentioned, Hamilton and McCord aren't DTs, which is really, what this thread is about.

As for the mention development...Miami should be in win-now mode...this team skipped two bowl games under Golden, so, once we are free and clear of the Bowl bans, we should be seeing this team play in significant football games.

And, sure, some guys develop, but those should be considered "nice surprises" moreover banking anything on them, especially this early in their career. Personally, I think Moore is the best of the bunch, but he's got a ceiling.

As for how dire the situation is...I disagree...I think it is need #1...pass rushers coming in #2 before a big drop off elsewhere.

Money post
 
Advertisement
I like Hamilton at DE for now because we need some size and length at that position. Shayon Green is a tough SOB but he's playing a role he shouldn't be playing for the sake of the team. Leonard Williams was a huge loss.
 
Speaking of Sapps strength, I saw him on ESPNs Ultimate Defender Competition vs other DL and LBs and he incline benched the 2nd highest @ 385. Dude is/was strong



La'Roi Glover beat him with 400lbs


Very strong. Opposite of "defined" in his upper body.

Yeah. Guys like Warren Sapp show up all the time. They are the rule rather than the exception.......right?

LMAO.

Most guys don't look like Sapp and at the same type perform like Sapp.
 
Last edited:
Suh was a 4 star DT. I agree we really need to see how these guys develop so long as we are still recruiting the sh*t out of the position until we find a rotation of studs.

Right now we aren't doing that. And that's the real point.

I don't care how many stars Suh had. He didn't do anything till his junior season, which was his 4th year in the program. Before that, he was a jag.

Nuff said.

You just proved you don't know WTF you are talking about and you obviously didn't follow Suhs entire career.

Boy showed flashes of dominance from the get. He was besdting already as a So. He was the best Dt in the country by year 3.

FWIW, that's not true. His 3rd year (RS So) he started 11 or 12 and had 34 tackles, 1 sack, 6 TFL (best DT in the country?).

His 4th year is when he really took the jump, 76 tackles, 7.5 sacks, 19 TFL. He then exploded his 5th year, 85 tackles, 12 sacks, 24 TFL.

FAIL.

His first season he took a medical shirt when he tore his knee. he didn't spend the year "developing" he spent it rehabbing.

He was FRESHMAN ALL BIG 12 the next season. That's instant impact.

The next season he was even more dominant even though the stats show. But you wouldn't know that because you didn't actually WATCH him play.

He was dominant already. His junior season he was already the best DT in the county. His senior season was all world.

But again way to fail to make a decent point in this thread. Its clear you only post to white knight the staff when you get a chance.

At least we know you can google because you have yet to post anything remotely resembling knowledge of football.

1. You can't count.

2. 34 Tackles, 1 sack, 6 TFL on a defense that was in the bottom 5 in rush defense in all of college football and bottom 10 overall = dominate. Unreal. Guess Pierre was dominant this year since he put up close to the same numbers.
 
I don't care how many stars Suh had. He didn't do anything till his junior season, which was his 4th year in the program. Before that, he was a jag.

Nuff said.

You just proved you don't know WTF you are talking about and you obviously didn't follow Suhs entire career.

Boy showed flashes of dominance from the get. He was besdting already as a So. He was the best Dt in the country by year 3.

FWIW, that's not true. His 3rd year (RS So) he started 11 or 12 and had 34 tackles, 1 sack, 6 TFL (best DT in the country?).

His 4th year is when he really took the jump, 76 tackles, 7.5 sacks, 19 TFL. He then exploded his 5th year, 85 tackles, 12 sacks, 24 TFL.

FAIL.

His first season he took a medical shirt when he tore his knee. he didn't spend the year "developing" he spent it rehabbing.

He was FRESHMAN ALL BIG 12 the next season. That's instant impact.

The next season he was even more dominant even though the stats show. But you wouldn't know that because you didn't actually WATCH him play.

He was dominant already. His junior season he was already the best DT in the county. His senior season was all world.

But again way to fail to make a decent point in this thread. Its clear you only post to white knight the staff when you get a chance.

At least we know you can google because you have yet to post anything remotely resembling knowledge of football.

1. You can't count.

2. 34 Tackles, 1 sack, 6 TFL on a defense that was in the bottom 5 in rush defense in all of college football and bottom 10 overall = dominate. Unreal. Guess Pierre was dominant this year since he put up close to the same numbers.

Again you fail and at the same time prove you know nothing about football. I guess Vince Wilfork is having a mediocre year with his 27 total tackles and 2 sacks in 14 games.

Yeah, he's not one of the best Nose Tackles in football at all.

LMAO.
 
Advertisement
I like Hamilton at DE for now because we need some size and length at that position. Shayon Green is a tough SOB but he's playing a role he shouldn't be playing for the sake of the team. Leonard Williams was a huge loss.

Hamilton has the potential to be good...but he's a ways away. He needed a redshirt year...he was recovering from a knee injury, and he is a guy that needed a body recomp. He can be that 6'5", 305lb 3 or 5 technique this defensive line needs, but he won't get there until his junior year at the earliest. And, to be fair, I really struggle to see him project as a DT right now...I mean, its possible, I just haven't seen an ability to anchor at any level yet that would make him a player you want to see on the inside. I'd like to see him develop into a nice stack and shed end.
 
Last edited:
Haha. I think he's saying he's not a dude with a big *** + thighs, which is what limits, as Larry noted, his ability to drop and anchor. I'm not gonna project this dude's growth in that area, so I'll just wait and see what happens over the next year. He's the type of guy who'd probably need to wait till year 3. And, I guess the fair point is that we need DTs right now.

Yeah that's what I've heard but I thought a while back Alex also mentioned that Hamilton has very little definition in his upper body - soft, as it were.

Nick Fairley and Warren Fapp have never been mistaken for Lee Haney.

You are missing the point. Doesn't have the big butt and big thighs that you want with a DT. Earl Moore is a tank. ****, even King is a big boy. Hamilton, on the other hand, is a little light in the ***. He doesn't compare to the DTs that we currently have on the roster now, much less Fairley or Sapp.

Thanks for your help, but I wasn't missing the point AU made. He mentioned that Hamilton has "very little definition in his UPPER BODY-soft as it were (emphasis added)". He turned the discussion to upper body defintion, which was a perfect place actually to mention 2 dudes with the upper body definition of newborn babies. Thanks though.

You're still missing the point because you're attempting to compare the build of Jelani to Sapp or Fairley, and that's a stretch. Just doesn't have that frame.
 
I like Hamilton at DE for now because we need some size and length at that position. Shayon Green is a tough SOB but he's playing a role he shouldn't be playing for the sake of the team. Leonard Williams was a huge loss.

Hamilton has the potential to be good...but he's a ways away. He needed a redshirt year...he was recovering from a knee injury, and he is a guy that needed a body recomp. He can be that 6'5", 305lb 3 or 5 technique this defensive line needs, but he won't get there until his junior year at the earliest. And, to be fair, I really struggle to see him project as a DT right now...I mean, its possible, I just haven't seen an ability to anchor at any level yet that would make him a player you want to see on the inside. I'd like to see him develop into a nice stack and shed end.

With work, nutrition and some help (cough, juice, cough) I think he's a guy that could end up 275, 280. Again, just my personal opinion from seeing him on several occasions. I could be dead wrong. He doesn't have a huge frame.
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back
Top