So...can we get a statue at Greentree for Dennis Dodd?
http://www.cbssports.com/collegefoo...tutional-control-emmert-must-pay-with-his-job
The NCAA is guilty of failure to monitor and lack of institutional control. Guilty of its own rules which it applies arbitrarily and -- at times -- unfairly.
Take a dip in the deep end of that pool of irony.
Bylaw is 11.1.2.1 states that in such case a coach must “promote an atmosphere for compliance within the program … and to monitor the activities regarding compliance of assistant coaches and other administrators.”
For this this case – marking one of the most embarrassing days in NCAA history – president Mark Emmert is the coach. And he must step down. Even if you believe the scandal stopped at former enforcement director Julie Roe Lach – which it doesn't -- Emmert was her boss. And from Enron to Watergate to Camelot, bosses have fallen on swords.
If Mark Emmert didn't know that company funds were being misappropriated in the Miami investigation, he should have known. That's what good bosses/coaches do.
The NCAA is his team. Scores of real coaches' careers have been eternally damaged for a lot less evidence that what the NCAA uncovered itself.
On Monday, the NCAA announced it had fired its director of enforcement – the chief cop on the beat – for overseeing the use of an outside attorney to gather information in the Miami case. As reported by CBSSports.com last month, Roe Lach approved at least $20,000 in payments to Maria Elena Perez to ask questions regarding the Miami case during an unrelated deposition.
Roe Lach and the NCAA reportedly got little or nothing for their money. The NCAA said whatever was gathered will be stricken from the investigation. Not that it mattered. An enforcement department frequently accused of overreaching, got caught itself.
The immediate question is what did Emmert know and when did he know it?
The question was not asked on Monday's conference call because I was cut off before it could.
Emmert must step down because if he didn't know, he should have. He must step down because Roe Lach was his hand-picked director of enforcement. She was only the sixth enforcement director in the six-decade history of the process – and the first woman. To believe that even any vice president could go down to a pay window and grab $20,000 to hire an outside attorney bends the concept of believability.
We know that Mark Emmert has to step down because if he didn't know, he wasn't doing his job. Not even close to it.
What did he know and when did he know it? That question took down Richard Nixon because he danced around it until he was forced to resign. What did he know and when did he know it? Apparently NCAA No. 2 Jim Isch approved the $20,000 but didn't follow up. Isnt' he as much to blame in this as Roe Lach?
Oh, and the Kansas City attorney (Jon Duncan) charged with oversight of the enforcement department cleanup, is currently representing the NCAA in a nine-year old case against a former Buffalo basketball coach. How's that for objectivity?
Two sources (USA Today/ESPN.com) have previously reported that it didn't stop at
Roe Lach, that general counsel Donald Remy knew and approved the payment.
Paraphrasing from countless infractions committees whose burden of
proof is low, "That's hard to believe," that he didn't.
Quoting directly from the late Paul Dee: "High profile athletes demand
high-profile compliance."
Dee was the infractions committee chair in 2010 when he chastised USC for the
Reggie Bush scandal. Meanwhile, his Miami athletic department was
being infiltrated by Nevin Shapiro.
Who are we supposed to believe at all?