Canesfreak
The Sponsor
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2012
- Messages
- 3,229
Watching both their **** bouncing around on the sidelines would be entertaining.**** no to Grantham
Watching both their **** bouncing around on the sidelines would be entertaining.**** no to Grantham
Would be happy with this hire. Still would like to see how the staff is shuffled with Joe S moving off field hopefully and then firing Chevis. Gives him potentially 2 hires he can make himself if he keeps Taylor and NicholsonThis is definitely one of the names I’d watch
But, we are a national brand!*Well nevermind
Why though? What metric am I missing with him and his defensesMake Santucci an offer he can’t refuse and call it a day.
Are there even any names that are worth discussing ? Some of these are aight. The GT DC is interesting. Idk.
I dont Like the fact that ga tech was one of the worst teams in football of sacking the qb under santucciWhy though? What metric am I missing with him and his defenses
Taking a deeper dive I just don’t feel comfortable banking on him being Mario’s last dc at Miami. Did a nice job disguising blitzes and coverages but it’s easy to bring a bottom feeder defense just to middling numbers.I dont Like the fact that ga tech was one of the worst teams in football of sacking the qb under santucci
Hiring Santucci reminds me of when Mario was at Oregon and he hired Tim DeRuyter from Cal. I’ve seen this movie before and I will pass.Make Santucci an offer he can’t refuse and call it a day.
Ouff you're memory is short.Ngl a DC with similarities to what Diaz ran would do wonders. Our best defenses of the past decade were 2017/2018 and if we had an offense like we did this year we are thriving.
We need to get back to what works for a MIAMI defense and especially with an efficient offense like ours was this past season, you can afford a riskier defense that provides a greater reward like Diaz’s were able to provide. Not to mention 2nd half adjustments were always very apparent.
I’m not familiar with any particular coordinator’s that we are on but we better be on a style that causes havoc and imposes physicality like we had it between 2016-2018
IF we get such an upgrade at DC that we hinting at then it’s all on the portal QB at that point.
I believe this program will take a turn towards being a legit contender if we get that defense right.
If that’s the back 7 they evaluated and were comfortable with in year 3 that is hella concerning.Yes that was bad. But I posted it anyway
Our back 7 was atrocious
How y’all feel about Mel Tucker? Might not be a bad choice
Im not 100% with you on this take. Yes the fundamentals were bad but the simple fast approach i think is what we need.Ouff you're memory is short.
Diaz's défense is similar to what we have and had zero adjustments and the fundamentals were atrocious.
Stay away from Diaz or anything similar, don't some ppl learn.