You said better Football players come from Florida, but better Football is played in Texas & I said that's simply not true.
Meaning, there's no way to actually value judge the quality of Football player coming from either region, it's a case by case basis & it's strictly depending on what criteria you choose to use.
- Are you judging by NFL or College?
- Is it based on productivity of each player per position?
- Is it simply amount of players drafted from one region or State?
- Are you going by accolades?
What's your criteria to say one state produces better players?
I've never said that Texas has better players than Florida (except at QB its not even debatable); but what I've been screaming about for the last 7 years is that completely ignoring a state that has as much talent as TX is extremely stupid, mainly because literally every single conference & playoff contending team in the country recruits TX, literally all of them.
There aren't any teams who homogeneously recruit just their own State & have success. National recruiting is how you win Championships & this line of thinking that we should sign 25 kids from FL every year & call it a day is just foolish. The staff doesn't obviously feel that way, so that's a great thing, they've done a very good job recruiting Nationally.
It's simply a matter of adjusting their focus to another region the same way they're currently doing for Alabama, Georgia & the Midwest. If we can put effort & resources into recruiting kids from Illinois, Kentucky & Indiana, we can do the same for TX.