Nooooo. You invented a problem that didn't exist.
Yes, I realize that the Big 10 had a scenario for a 16 team conference. But the game has changed, and with Washington-Oregon only getting $30M and trying to squeeze the Big 10 for $10M in travel expenses, but only getting $1M, then some changes will be made.
And for weeks, we have talked about the Big 10 (and SEC) playing more conference games (at least 9, probably 10) in order to earn the extra TV money post-expansion, but you IMMEDIATELY had to find fault with my post and act like there would not be a sufficient rotation of games.
You do exactly what
@Rellyrell said, you look for an argument against even the most innocuous of posts. I posted a scenario in which a 6-team addition in a year or two would be able to be blended in seamlessly, and you immediately harped on the rotation of teams.
It's your brand. Own it.