- Joined
- Feb 9, 2021
- Messages
- 12,385
The past 5-10 years.They had a more recent great team. Very understandable and those things go up and down. We have been prolonged horrible. I doubt that remains the same for much longer.
The past 5-10 years.They had a more recent great team. Very understandable and those things go up and down. We have been prolonged horrible. I doubt that remains the same for much longer.
No one overestimate Miami tv ratings. We are being compared to teams who had recent national championship teams, or plays against more big time opponents every season like UF. When we are good and they are good, they dont compare. Miami is polarising like Notre Dame, worse actually. Everybody watch if we ever get good againpeople overestimate Miamis tv ratings. we draw well for the big games like a lot of other teams but our average reach isnt as expansive as people think it is. we aren't worthless but we aren't more watched on average than the other in state schools (UF and FSU). part of why UM is valuable in expansion talk isnt bc of our football or hoops team, but its the market you gain access to.
not amazing.Anyone have the numbers on our 2017 run? I'd bet every one of our games the 2nd half of the season had a lot of eyeballs.
Well, you got two heavy reasons why it isn't enforceable, either way, Miami will get out and thats all she wrote.well, id say this - idk if it is enforceable or not. none of us have seen it (or at least i havent so i cant say it is or it isnt). i am sure that all these schools have been billing out cntract lawyers at akerman, HK, etc. to review the agreement to find a loophole or an out. either way, that part i cant comment on. i was only referring to the choice of law as tom mars thought this was some crazy thing (it isnt). we use this often where i work with all of our agreements because theyre always international and out of state agreements. only time we ever end up using the home state law is when the other side just misses it and signs it or both are located in the same state
the last time we were good in a marquee game our tv number wasn't where it should have been. bama-ole miss and uga-AU outdrew us the same dayNo one overestimate Miami tv ratings. We are being compared to teams who had recent national championship teams, or plays against more big time opponents every season like UF. When we are good and they are good, they dont compare. Miami is polarising like Notre Dame, worse actually. Everybody watch if we ever get good again
Yeah... this whole 'it is not enforceable' take doesn't make sense - or at least not in that it is cut and dry. If FSU, Clemson, Miami, etc were convinced that it was a slam dunk that they could get out, I have to imagine they would have left by now. I could see them possibly believing they have a way out, but they have at least a decent amount of doubt - enough that is not worth them risking losing - and that is why they haven't left yet.well, id say this - idk if it is enforceable or not. none of us have seen it (or at least i havent so i cant say it is or it isnt). i am sure that all these schools have been billing out cntract lawyers at akerman, HK, etc. to review the agreement to find a loophole or an out. either way, that part i cant comment on. i was only referring to the choice of law as tom mars thought this was some crazy thing (it isnt). we use this often where i work with all of our agreements because theyre always international and out of state agreements. only time we ever end up using the home state law is when the other side just misses it and signs it or both are located in the same state
That surprises me. There was SO MUCH buzz for that game with the historical rivalry, top 10 matchup, turnover chain phenomenon, etc.not amazing.
CFB Week 11: Notre Dame-Miami Good, But Not Great, on ABC
Notre Dame-Miami ratings were good, but nothing spectacular, for ABC. The game ranked just third for the weekend in viewership behind a pair of SEC games.www.sportsmediawatch.com
@Rellyrell had a great post years or at least a year ago on our brand and tv.That surprises me. There was SO MUCH buzz for that game with the historical rivalry, top 10 matchup, turnover chain phenomenon, etc.
I hear ya that makes total sense.fwiw, i have been to SEC games too. its a joke (the comment not the games), but in terms of our school, the big 10 is a better fit. UF is barely a fit for the SEC due to the large amount of "City" kids enrolled (Orlando and Miami (tampa is a bit southern still but thats changing post covid)). miami would be an insane culture shock lol. with our alumni, the big 10 market would make our away game attendance even better.
ACC.That surprises me. There was SO MUCH buzz for that game with the historical rivalry, top 10 matchup, turnover chain phenomenon, etc.
It's almost as if these simpletons get paid to generate clicks.This is the gift that keeps on giving for the media types. "Everything has changed", to "nothing has changed" in an hour.
That was 1 season. These are prolonged relevant teams. We didnt have great players or a great team, just had a good seasonthe last time we were good in a marquee game our tv number wasn't where it should have been. bama-ole miss and uga-AU outdrew us the same day
Sure... but that is between the two fanbases. Let's say Nebraska was having a really good year and had a game against Texas would you say to yourself 'I really need to see that game'? I might tune into it for a bit if nothing else was on, but really doubt I would watch the whole thing. And I am sure it didn't help the ratings that the game was a blow out.That surprises me. There was SO MUCH buzz for that game with the historical rivalry, top 10 matchup, turnover chain phenomenon, etc.
Dont totally agree. U have to wrok out where everyone will land and when, including the teams who wont be in the SEC or BIG. All these conferences are not working on tge same timelines. The SEC for example seems totally fine chilling after Texas and OUYeah... this whole 'it is not enforceable' take doesn't make sense - or at least not in that it is cut and dry. If FSU, Clemson, Miami, etc were convinced that it was a slam dunk that they could get out, I have to imagine they would have left by now. I could see them possibly believing they have a way out, but they have at least a decent amount of doubt - enough that is not worth them risking losing - and that is why they haven't left yet.
If you're consistent with it, sure it helps, but at that point, people didn't rate Notre Dame that much. Its an old rivalry and Notre Dame isn't as marketable as people may assume.eh that was a primetime ABC slot with two top 10 teams (3 vs 7). it should have been the most watched game that day esp for the time slot since UGA AU was at 330. I just think viewership has changed over time thats all. we aren't a draw. obviously, If we get back to being the 80s canes that changes as a lot have said, but I dont think well ever be that again. maybe we win a title or two in the next 20 years, but I dont ever see us being the 4 in 10 year span
I mean ok.That was 1 season. These are prolonged relevant teams. We didnt have great players or a great team, just had a good season
NDs brand is large but I will agree that they aren't the most watched out there.If you're consistent with it, sure it helps, but at that point, people didn't rate Notre Dame that much. Its an old rivalry and Notre Dame isn't as marketable as people may assume.
AU-UGA was a blowout and they had the highest number of the weekend.Sure... but that is between the two fanbases. Let's say Nebraska was having a really good year and had a game against Texas would you say to yourself 'I really need to see that game'? I might tune into it for a bit if nothing else was on, but really doubt I would watch the whole thing. And I am sure it didn't help the ratings that the game was a blow out.