- Joined
- Dec 22, 2011
- Messages
- 47,465
@TheOriginalCane @Wake_Cane @DMoney @JeddTheFisch
If FSU/Miami challenged GoR under today (or future) FL law, that's a big deal right?
i routinely preside over cases under CIS jurisdiction. Why not here?
Is there someone I can call to get this scheduled?
In cases of jurisdiction for a contract dispute, it normally follows "first to file" when there is no provision for choice of forum. Even if a case went to "federal court", there are federal judges who sit in all the various 50 states.
So, yes, I would think that the venue matters and would have an impact.
If anyone recalls, Miami and Arkansas State had a bit of a kerfluffle over Miami filing "first" in its dispute over the game that got cancelled due to hurricane. The case ultimately settled out of court, but if Miami cared enough to "file first" and try to get SoFla as its venue, I can **** SURE tell you that they will try to do the same for any GOR lawsuit.
I still am not sure who we are fighting though. Does the ACC "own" our rights under the initial GOR? Or were our rights sold or assigned to ESPN in the TV deal? Because while Mars may be correct on the GOR document, I am not sure whether that would be the right analysis if our adversary is ESPN and the underlying document is the TV deal, under the premise that ESPN now owns our rights, not the ACC.