- Joined
- Dec 21, 2016
- Messages
- 5,679
Let's just look at matchups (not EVERY year, but on a rotation).its top heavy. you have two marquee opponents that draw huge numbers (Mich OSU). then you have an okay opponent (MSU). then you have your historical tie in (NEB). then you have a lot of nothing that would make a casual fan tune in (Indiana, NW, Minny, etc.). it'll be a change in the beginning bc of the newness of the opponents but once the south Floridians get a taste of the bad of the b10, it'll revert back. it'll be nice to have something diff tho
To me it seems the BIG 10 wants to create a southern division. I wouldn't use the word as in that they will bring back division, just a cluster full of teams south.I thought the B10 got rid of divisions for 2024 and beyond?
I'm sure its mostly the money. But if you don't think UNC and probably UVA aren't considering the fallout of WF, Duke and NCSU you are naive.No one is stopping moving conferences because they care about helping out Wake Forest....
On any consistent measure, Mich hasn't really been "that good" for decades, nor PSU.its top heavy. you have two marquee opponents that draw huge numbers (Mich OSU). then you have an okay opponent (MSU). then you have your historical tie in (NEB). then you have a lot of nothing that would make a casual fan tune in (Indiana, NW, Minny, etc.). it'll be a change in the beginning bc of the newness of the opponents but once the south Floridians get a taste of the bad of the b10, it'll revert back. it'll be nice to have something diff tho
in terms of being good yes. I meant more so tv balls. I forgot PSU but theyre another big ratings drawOn any consistent measure, Mich hasn't really been "that good" for decades, nor PSU.
Big10 is basically Ohio State as routine contender.
zone saying I want out. AD saying the same. The Board of Regents which controls says get ASU on board or enjoy pac 12 after darkOhhh to hear what 'Zona President & AD are saying
Because with these huge conferences there are fewer opportunities for out of conference games. And they'd want to use those for smaller schools as most do now. Just look at UF. Stopped the annual rivalry with us. Yeah, it COULD happen, but I could also see it not happening. Just keep us in conference and avoid the whole thing.
There is no saving both, long term. Without the kind of media deal that the 10/sec get, the rest of college football will be a bunch of also rans. And the merger of the acc and the husk of the p12 don't command that kind of media deal.Phillips should be on a place heading west right now. I've always thought the Pac 12 and ACC should have merged. Not a slam dunk, but it's the only to save both conferences long term. The opportunity may have presented itself again.
clemson is oging to the SEC not big 10.Let's just look at matchups (not EVERY year, but on a rotation).
ACC Currently: FSU, VT, UNC, occasionally Clemson, occasionally ND
B1G (in my scenario): FSU, Clemson, ND, OSU, PSU, Mich, MSU, Wisc, Neb, VT, USC, UCLA
Just 4 of those a year on a rotation and it's MUCH more marketable year to year. Yeah you're still going to get a handful of less attractive schools—no disagreement there—but it's inevitable and, I'd say, necessary.