- Joined
- Nov 12, 2015
- Messages
- 16,625
Ageee
Maybe a conference move is FB only, and remaining sports remain in a basketball-centric ACC? Nah…
Agree on the travel. But the same for USC and UCLA, no? Makes no sense, especially when other sports are factored in.I was on Team B1G at first, particularly for the academics and like-minded universities (to some extent) but I just can't get over the geography of it all.
We really want to play a cold weather midwest schedule in football, where the majority of our road games are 1000+ miles away?
I randomly picked Maryland as an example. This year their B1G road schedule is (with flying distance from Miami):
@Michigan State (1195 miles)
@Ohio State (992 miles)
@Northwestern (1189 miles)
@nebraska (1405 miles)
@Rutgers (1068 miles)
Blech, and brrrrrr. And add 30-50%~ more miles if you're driving.
Same for basketball, we'd be at a decided disadvantage where we'd travel like 5x farther each season than the other conference members. Wears ya down.
We want baseball to be in the B1G? What in the heavenly ****. Not even going there.
And lord, how in the **** are the girls and other sports going to deal? 1000 mile flights for the volleyball team?
The travel burdens will add up, IMO.
The SEC makes a lot more sense to me. You want to play where you recruit, and the SEC footprint is where the most top talent in the country is, and it's close to us. A lot of recruits and their families want to be able to get to road games, etc. Not to mention the SEC teams wouldn't be able to recruit against us with "SEC! SEC!" nonsense.
If the SEC is able to add say, Miami and UNC to start, it elevates its academic reputation somewhat. Vandy, UNC, Miami, UF, UGA, and TAMU is a formidable top tier.
Maybe a conference move is FB only, and remaining sports remain in a basketball-centric ACC? Nah…