- Joined
- Feb 6, 2012
- Messages
- 7,977
I have a question: would we consider this kid a similar type to Arnoux? And if so, which one would we rather?
They both are slow and not what we need but Ewald is local but I’m not sure that even matters anymore anyway.I have a question: would we consider this kid a similar type to Arnoux? And if so, which one would we rather?
Does either have a more athletic younger brother or best friend that can run sub 4.5? That would be my pick.I have a question: would we consider this kid a similar type to Arnoux? And if so, which one would we rather?
both are JagsI have a question: would we consider this kid a similar type to Arnoux? And if so, which one would we rather?
Fair enough...and I know that this might be apples and oranges due to where they're at in terms of their development (i.e. one is a late bloomer and one seems to have plateaued)...but would you have called OJ a JAG this time last year? Because I know I would have.both are Jags
if we keep taking jags well just keep expecting to see jag dbs
this staff has clearly shown a lack of player development
harris has been under Mario for 3 years and is a Jag
M Williams hasnt developed
not one DB has come in and developed and gotten progressively better
the last DB coach that showed development was either Rumph or Banda
i bet OJ will shine this year and then plateau or even regress
And many people on this board bashed Banda mercilesslyboth are Jags
if we keep taking jags well just keep expecting to see jag dbs
this staff has clearly shown a lack of player development
harris has been under Mario for 3 years and is a Jag
M Williams hasnt developed
not one DB has come in and developed and gotten progressively better
the last DB coach that showed development was either Rumph or Banda
i bet OJ will shine this year and then plateau or even regress
Presented without comment, here are Ewald's senior highlights:
The likelihood we solve the DB problem in the portal is very very small. As Dmoney say's every bank episode, this position group is going to be solved through high school recruitingI pray their is better DB talent in the portal this off season. We are going shopping for a backfield and we better be looking to overspend to get it. It's gotten even crazier. I can only laugh with what is happening with recruiting. Their are so many great HC recruiters today. It's like it's almost unbelievable.
there are 5 div 1 wrs on that clip. (Ole Miss, Fau, a pending Notre Dame Commit, the other two are juniors who likely end up power 5)Yeah not too impressed. Technique looks fine but he's getting beat off the line too often for my taste. Shows some decent makeup speed but can he do that vs ACC receivers. He looks like he'd be abused by good slot guys. He won't see the field next year and hopefully Chevis & the strength staff can get something out of him but I'm not counting on it.
Two more Powell's? No thanksNeed two starter-level portal safeties.
He's not starter quality. He's a bum. We have one player, Patterson, who might be starter quality next year.Two more Powell's? No thanks
They NEED to fix it with portal guys...they need plug n play with experience. Maybe 2 safeties and at minimum one corner.The likelihood we solve the DB problem in the portal is very very small. As Dmoney say's every bank episode, this position group is going to be solved through high school recruiting
They need 2 safeties. Powell level at minimum.He's not starter quality. He's a bum. We have one player, Patterson, who might be starter quality next year.
If not 2 starters from the portal, then we must land Ben Hanks. Non-negotiable if we want to fix the position.
If I wasn't mistaken, wasn't Powell a top 5 safety out of the portal? There is a very low chance we can get a quality safety out of the portal, let a lone. I hope I'm wrong. Dmoney said it best, dbs are going to primarily be resolved out of hsHe's not starter quality. He's a bum. We have one player, Patterson, who might be starter quality next year.
If not 2 starters from the portal, then we must land Ben Hanks. Non-negotiable if we want to fix the position.
We would all love that. The question is will the quality be there? Odds are not in our favor thereThey NEED to fix it with portal guys...they need plug n play with experience. Maybe 2 safeties and at minimum one corner.
They need to over pay if they have to but thats whats needed.
Both, two starters and Hanks. I want Hanks more than Pickett. Hanks is a legit CB. I’m not sure where Pickett ends up on the field. We need a real CBHe's not starter quality. He's a bum. We have one player, Patterson, who might be starter quality next year.
If not 2 starters from the portal, then we must land Ben Hanks. Non-negotiable if we want to fix the position.
As bad as the db play has been ...dude still has 4 picks with more games remaining.If I wasn't mistaken, wasn't Powell a top 5 safety out of the portal? There is a very low chance we can get a quality safety out of the portal, let a lone. I hope I'm wrong. Dmoney said it best, dbs are going to primarily be resolved out of hs
I wasn't one of the guys who had joy at their departure. I consistently warned about how bad our DBs were in the offseason. I also highlighted how awful our LBs wre against the pass, including Kiko, who this board seemed to regard as the next Junior Seau.They need 2 safeties. Powell level at minimum.
Just imagine this secondary witout Powell considering you guys were screaming with tears of joy for Kam Kinchens and James Williams to go.